Follow this blog:
RSS

GE’s new ‘brilliant’ wind turbine for low wind sites

By | January 31, 2013, 11:50 AM PST

With a rotor as big as the London Eye, GE’s new wind turbine is massive, but it’s also smart and efficient.

The new 2.5-megawatt turbine (with a 120-meter rotor) is described by GE as “the world’s most efficient high-output and the first brilliant wind turbine.” Compared to its current model, the new model has a 25 percent increase in efficiency and a 15 percent increase in power output. And since it’s so efficient, GE is marketing the turbine to places that aren’t very breezy, specifically targeting forested areas in Canada and Europe.

And what makes the turbine smart? Here’s a fun cartoon from GE breaking it down:

Vic Abate, vice president of GE’s renewable energy business, explains in more technical terms:

“Our 2.5-120 is the first wind turbine that utilizes the Industrial Internet to help manage the intermittency of wind, providing smooth, predictable power to the world regardless of what Mother Nature throws its way,”  Abate said in a news release. ”Analyzing tens of thousands of data points every second, the 2.5-120 integrates energy storage and advanced forecasting algorithms while communicating seamlessly with neighboring turbines, service technicians and customers.”

The first prototype of the new wind turbine is planned to be installed in the Netherlands next month.

Photo: GE

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Surrounded by smarts but not the best at partial wind
The turbine is surrounded by smarts to get the most out of it. At partial wind, 40 to 60% of capacity, where all wind turbines operate most of the time, GE's previous 2.5 and 2.7 MW turbines produce more.
Posted by Benny Nyberg
1st Feb
+8 Votes
+ -
WTF ?
Fundamentally, why not put the

- Wind Turbines in windy areas
- Solar in Sunny Area's
- Hydro in Wet hilly area's
- Tidal in high change estuaries or where significant ocean currents are
- Geothermal in Volcanic area's
- and Oil/Gas/Nuclear/Biomass/CHP everywhere else ??
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Lovely
Now we can all enjoy more bird killing machines on our horizons.
Posted by canisdirus
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Bird killing machines ???
Where do you get your info? Have you seen wind farms and the size of the rotors. The blades move right along but the actual RPMS are slow so birds can see them and get out of the way. If the birds are night flyers or are blind and stupid I suppose they are fair game otherwise they will avoid the turbines. Find a wind farm and walk around it and count the fallen birds. Not very many.
Posted by radiodog4@...
1st Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
real bird killers
know what the real bird killers are?

http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2013/01/chart-cats-vs-turbines
Posted by Tyler Falk
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Wind nonsense
120m rotor for 2.5MW of installed (less than 500kW of average) power? No matter how much hi-tech you put in a nonsense, nonsense remains what it was. Ugly, polluting, inefficient and, well, state-of-the art nonsense.
Posted by praoss
1st Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
Even the Oil Rich Middle East is changing over...
Good to see energy technology of this scale shaping up. Negatives of wind power and other "Green" energy like Solar, Geothermal, and Hydro are significantly outweighed by the negatives produced by burning finite carbon based fuels for energy and dumping the results into the atmosphere.

Comments found here generally do brilliantly expose how afraid we really are of change and new technology. The future of energy is coming, no matter how much resistance it runs up against. We really need to lead the world into this new era, instead of wallowing behind.

Change of any sort has always been difficult for some people. If we didn't eventually accept and grasp change, we would still be living in caves, thinking that the universe revolved around our flat world. The box may be a comfortable and easy place to exist, but we really do need to think outside its confines once in a while to make progress.
Posted by MaineBikah
1st Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
GE's big windmill
As a stockholder -- great!

As an engineer -- so what? Still the most inefficient and resource-wasting power source.

As an environmentalist -- what an eyesore.
Posted by DrAlexC
1st Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Solar
So, would solar panels on every roof in America be enough to power America?
Posted by johncmccann
1st Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
naysayers
I can't believe the negative comments about windmills. What is you peoples problem? Are the windmills of Holland called ugly? Really, what is so bad about them?
Posted by Jeff Cardinal
2nd Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Simple observations.
Both from a functional and an aesthetic standpoint, there is no comparison between these towering monstrosities and the classic wind mills of Holland.

The classic windmills of Holland are a beautiful sight on the flat lands they are found on. They complement their surroundings.

These hulking heaps are brutal on the eyes when placed on an otherwise green tree topped mountain or a beautiful coastline.

The classic Holland windmill also has large enough blades that they are highly visible to birds and are not a bird strike danger.

The skinny bladed modern wind turbine has been repeatedly proven to be a bird killer.

Mountain top wind mill farms on the west coast have been found to be on millennia old migratory flight paths. Making them responsible for the deaths of millions of birds over the past 40 years.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-04-windmills-usat_x.htm

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/08/16/energy-in-america-dead-birds-unintended-consequence-wind-power-development/

The proposed off shore wind farms will cause huge problems for migratory birds.

http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/migratory-bird-flyways-and-off-shore-wind-farms-a-co-evolutionary-overlap.html
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 4th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
more accurate observations
Bird migratory routes are mapped and recent wind installations are avoiding those paths. Far, far more birds die by flying into residential glass windows. Personally, when I have seen elegant white modern windmills on the horizon, I've been stunned by how beautiful they look. The comparison should not be to antique Dutch windmills but rather to the polluting smokestacks of coal-fired power plants.
Posted by lenupinnh
4th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
They are mapped now. Mostly.
Migratory birds were not part of the discussion on wind farms until at least 2002.

All of the wind farms built prior to that were more concerned with location for getting wind.

And none of the wind farms proposed for the east coast of the US have addressed migratory bird concerns.

Massachusetts and the feds have tight controls of beach use during the nesting season of the endangered piper plovers yet the Cape Wind project straddles their migratory route less than 100 miles from those beaches.

http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Technologies_DG_Renewables/Piping-Plovers-Whip-Up-Stormy-Legal-Seas-for-Cape-Cod-Offshore-Wind-Farm-2584.html

They even banned kit boarding because the kites may scare the birds, but they approved proven bird killing wind turbines.

Are they stupid or just bought by the GEs of the wind lobby?

On your other point, I was following up on " Are the windmills of Holland called ugly?" comment.
Posted by Hates Idiots
4th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Millions of birds
over 40 years, compared to the billions killed by existing power infrastructure, pollution, cities, development of land etc.

Yes, we need to take more care locating these things but they are necessary. Even if you, for example, covered everyone's houses with solar panels you'd still need to find a source of Lead, Lithium, Nickel and other electrolytic materials to build the batteries needed to store locally produced power. Be it from solar or wind or whatever...

Speaking from aesthetics, I'd much rather have to look at windmills than people out of my window. They both go round and round, but at least the windmills are doing something useful.
Posted by SiO2
6th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!