Follow this blog:
RSS

GE’s Immelt: ‘Industrial Internet’ revolution underway

By | November 28, 2012, 7:08 AM PST

Our friends at GigaOm published this morning an essay written by none other than General Electric chief executive Jeff Immelt, who suggests that the next technological phase is something he calls the “Industrial Internet,” so defined as ”an open, global network that connects people, data and machines.”

The concept is much like another we’ve tossed around here on SmartPlanet — the “Internet of Things” — but the focus is slightly different. Most technologists discuss an Internet of Things with regard to many connected personal devices, from toasters to televisions; Immelt’s “Industrial Internet” speaks more to the addition of intelligence — via sensors and connected networking technology — to take mechanical devices to the next level.

For a conglomerate like GE, which makes everything from locomotive engines to light bulbs, that means products (and the production line they’re made on) that are smart enough to help themselves.

Immelt writes:

The Industrial Internet leverages the power of the cloud to connect machines embedded with sensors and sophisticated software to other machines (and to us) so we can extract data, make sense of it and find meaning where it did not exist before. Machines — from jet engines to gas turbines to CT scanners — will have the analytical intelligence to self-diagnose and self-correct. They will be able to deliver the right information to the right people, all in real time. When machines can sense conditions and communicate, they become instruments of understanding. They create knowledge from which we can act quickly, saving money and producing better outcomes.

The technology for this is here today, but Immelt says industrial demand for increases in productivity will help drive this market transformation, whether for healthcare or transportation or energy. The size of this opportunity? About $15 trillion to global GDP by 2030, he estimates — “the equivalent of adding another U.S. economy to the world.” (Well!)

But there exist hurdles, including standardization (technologically speaking) and security (because the last thing you want is your subway system hacked).

Immelt says the so-called Industrial Internet era has already begun. What do you think?

Photo: Immelt in 2009. (GE)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Andrew Nusca

About Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca

Editor

Andrew Nusca is editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor for ZDNet. Previously, he worked at Money, Men's Vogue and Popular Mechanics magazines. He holds degrees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and New York University. He based in New York but resides in Philadelphia.

Follow him on Twitter.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew Nusca
Andrew Nusca does not hold any investments in the companies he covers.
If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Why should I care what he says.
Even while he has sat as chair of a useless presidential council on jobs he continues to move jobs out of the US to cheap foreign labor markets.

To date, during his tenure at GE, Immelt has cut over 35,000 GE jobs in the US while creating almost 30,000 jobs overseas.

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/ge-ceo-jeffrey-immelt-the-head-of-obamas-jobs-council-is-moving-jobs-and-economic-infrastructure-to-china-at-a-blistering-pace

While being a friend of and advisor to the president, he has been a clear example of all the president claims to hate in a rich guy.

Did I mention GE paid $0.00 income taxes in 2011 on billions earned because of renewable energy credits the Obama administration created?

I guess his campaign contributions bought him a pass with President Obama on the whole business ethics and pay your fair share issues.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 28th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
If you're interested in his reasons...
Immelt (and Cisco's John Chambers and Xerox's Ursula Burns) spoke about this reality at the Consumer Electronics Show two years ago.

From their respective perches, the U.S. job market isn't yet competitive enough for it to make sense to hire in the U.S. and not abroad:

http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/smart-takes/innovation-requires-immigration-top-us-executives-say/13381

I found it interesting.
Posted by andrew.nusca
28th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
I see your point, yet.
Being the chair of the presidents job council he has been in a position to influence people who can help with that problem.

Yet the jobs council has not met since the summer of 2011. And the president has shown little leadership in getting anything done to address the problems Immelt speaks of.

In spite of many promises in 2008, repeated in 2012, and controlling majorities in Congress his first 2 years, why was nothing was done by the Obama administration to address immigration or national competativness?

So again I ask. Why should I listen to him when he has done nothing to help the situation even as he was in a position to do something?
Posted by Hates Idiots
28th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!