Follow this blog:
RSS

For $30, world’s most energy efficient lightbulb

By | January 17, 2013, 4:28 AM PST

For years now, LEDs have been heralded as the heir-apparent to our old-school incandescent light bulb. Yet despite some serious advantages, such as much improved energy efficiency and a decades-long lifespan, the technology hasn’t quite lived up to expectations as an Edison-killer.

While the high up-front cost of an LED bulbs relative to traditional ones is often cited as a hindrance for some folks (though proponents have long argued it ends up being cost-effective in the long run), the most glaring issue, as lighting experts have pointed out, is a phenomenon referred to as “efficiency droop,” whereby efforts to increase a bulb’s electrical output to where it can adequately brighten large spaces like living rooms have also caused it to be less and less energy-efficient — sometimes to the point where it cancels out much of the purported financial benefits. Add to that more heat, which consequently reduces the bulb’s lifespan, and you have the main reason why LED models typically max out at a brightness range equal to that of mid-range 60 watt incandescents.

“The efficiency droop is one of the most severe and most interesting problems and controversies in science and engineering,” E. Fred Schubert, an electrical engineering professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York, told the New York Times. “Considering that LEDs are the winning future in lighting, [it’s important] for industry and society that the efficiency droop be understood and solved.”

But as scientists continue to investigate the underlying physics behind “efficiency droop,” a team of entrepreneurs comprised of Gimmy Chu, Tom Rodinger and Christian Yan have come up with a bulb design that apparently fixes the problem. The trio’s “breakthrough” invention not only offers an output of 1,600 lumens, equivalent to a 100W incandescent light bulb, it does so while operating at incredibly low power-sipping rating of 12W. In fact, they’ve claimed that the Nanolight is the world’s most efficient light bulb.

On the group’s Kickstarter page, engineer Tom Rodinger explains how the new design is a complete re-imagining of how a LED light bulb should work. While the dimensions of the bulb looks a bit funky, it features a low-cost geometrically-shaped circuit board that in turn enabled him to incorporate the most energy efficient diodes without adding to the overall cost. And by keeping the wattage low and efficient, he was able to do away with the standard heat sink used in just about all bulbs. The bulb also uses a special coating that allows for better heat dissipation so that it can operate at temperatures 20 degrees Fahrenheit cooler. Like incandescents, it even functions omnidirectionally.

All this translates to a lifespan that amounts to 30,000 hours at a total cost of $50. And with an average use of four hours a day, the Nanolight should last around 20 years.

The project has already surpassed its funding goal on Kickstarter and you can claim a 10W Nanolight (comparable to a 75W incandescent) for a pledge of 30 dollars. The 12W model will run you 45 dollars. For the skeptics out there, they’ve also posted a video showing the final prototype being put through a series of rigorous tests.

(via Kickstarter)

More “smart home” ideas:

More innovative products:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tuan Nguyen

About Tuan Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan Nguyen

Contributing Editor

Tuan C. Nguyen is a freelance science journalist based in New York City. He has written for the U.S. News and World Report, Fox News, MSNBC, ABC News, AOL, Yahoo! News and LiveScience. Formerly, he was reporter and producer for the technology section of ABCNews.com. He holds degrees from the University of California Los Angeles and the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan Nguyen

Tuan C. Nguyen does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Nano Light
Yes this is a good design and probably would have taken the market by storm 5 to 10 years ago! The brightness appears to be excellent however the high cost is the major deterrent
Now with the development of the much more efficient plastic luminescent plastic seem set to take the market. The low predictive cost will make it more acceptable.
Posted by randolphgarrison1@...
17th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
luminescent plastic
If possible, can you point to this product/project? It's interesting.
Posted by opcom
17th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Not the most energy efficient!
The claim "worlds most energy efficient lightbulb" may noy be that true. Look at another Kickstart project, the "Gravity Light". One time cost of $10 and gravity produces the power. Zero cost involved after the initial purchase. That is more likely the "worlds most energy efficient lightbulb".
Posted by Sun Chaser
17th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
not really
Work is still done when the user lifts up the 10-15 Kg bag of sand. That has to be counted. It is basically 'free', but from an engineering standpoint, it is some 20-30 "meter-Kg-seconds" of input power, and I assure you the mechanical generator in the Gravity Light is nowhere as efficient (30-50%?) as the plug-in-wall converter (80-95%). It is the world's most efficient, if the only consideration is 'zero utility electricity' consumption. It's like the old cuckoo clock. has to be wound. It's still a great and very-needed product and I hope it succeeds.
Posted by opcom
17th Jan
+2 Votes
+ -
a good improvement
LED efficiency increases as the current is reduced, but that value is different for each type of die made. It makes some sense to have a slab of one thousand 20mA LEDs over ten 2-Ampere ones. Still, LED and fluorescent are similarly efficient. Until the cost of LED comes down, fluorescent is the best choice for the frugal light-user. CFLs are not that efficient, but the long tubes are, and the companies who make that tech. continually strive to improve both lamp and ballast due to the "LED threat". Haha it's the good old fashioned design of the fluorescent lamp that is best cost/lumen today, but architects and designers don't like to be limited to a certain shape. I hope this project will progress and improve the choices and costs for efficient lighting.
Posted by opcom
17th Jan
+2 Votes
+ -
360 degrees almost full space
Why this lamp is lightning almost 360 space ?
Most uses of light need half space or less. To be clear, street lightning need to light the street, not the sky. So ? cut power by 50% and orient the lamp correctly.
Another example is the Fresnel light house where the lens system attempts to collect and re-direct light that goes away in the wrong direction.
This lamp can be manufactured so that the light goes only where it is needed.
Posted by jcqs.bchrd@...
17th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
I'm not a skeptic, but
There's no way that this bulb will last that long in real life applications. Perhaps it will make it 4-5 years tops. Modern circuit boards and components have relatively short lifespans of a couple of years. 20? Not a chance.
Posted by ajrmd
17th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Hazardous waste anyone?
Last time I looked, CFL's contained mercury.
Posted by bill1514@...
17th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
limited application... but a start.
I wouldn't put one of these in a bathroom or outdoors... It's another step in a good direction tho.
Posted by i8thecat4
17th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!