Follow this blog:
RSS

EPA chief Jackson stepping down

By | December 27, 2012, 9:10 AM PST

EPA chief Lisa Jackson, who kicked off her tenure with ambitious talk of addressing climate change and other environmental issues only to spend the next four years battling industry, announced she would step down.

Jackson said in a statement released Thursday the EPA has made historic progress in protecting the environment, maintaining clean air and water, ensuring food safety and moving toward energy independence.

“I will leave the EPA confident the ship is sailing in the right direction,” Jackson said in the statement. She didn’t give specific reasons for her departure, except to say she was ready for new challenges and to spend time with family.

Jackson’s tenure has been marked by a series of controversies over the past four years, beginning with the EPA’s final ruling in 2009 that greenhouse gases pose a danger to human health and the environment. The decision paved the way for regulation of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, refineries, factories  and vehicles.

In the wake of the so-called endangerment finding, the auto industry agreed to strict new emissions standards for light cars and trucks.

The EPA under Jackson’s lead had its fair share of defeats and setbacks. Jackson was a target of Republicans, who accused her of pushing forward job-killing regulations, and was called to testify before House committees dozens of times. Jackson brushed off the questioning, which was often hostile, as part of the territory and part of the new partisan reality, the NYT reported.

The EPA also was accused by environmentalists prior to President Barack Obama’s re-election of softening or delaying proposed standards for industry. The federal agency deferred requirements for industrial waste landfills to report methane correction factor used in their emissions until March 31, 2013. The EPA also postponed finalizing standards for cooling water intake structures at industrial facilities and delayed a rule for petroleum and natural gas systems, underground coal mines and industrial waste landfill operators to report data used to determine their greenhouse gas emissions.

At the same time, the EPA faced resistance from the White House, such as its rejection in 2011 of Jackson’s proposal to strengthen national smog standards.

Since Obama’s re-election there have been several decisions issued by the agency including tougher air quality standards for fine particulate matter, or soot, released from automobile exhausts and power plants as well as final Clean Air act rule for industrial boilers and incinerators.

Photo: EPA

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Kirsten Korosec

About Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Contributing Editor

Kirsten Korosec has written for Technology Review, Marketing News, The Hill, BNET and Bloomberg News. She holds a degree from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. She is based in Tucson, Arizona.

Follow her on Twitter.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Good riddance to bad trash.
This ego maniac has done little but further politicize the EPA into a group of thugs attacking the presidents enemies while letting friendly industries and politically favored groups slid.

These are some of my favorite targeted EPA attacks aimed at small farmers. Tax laws have been designed to kill small farms for decades, now the EPA is in the fight.

Funny how these EPA ideas always seem to come up after big farm lobbies visit the White House.

EPA declares hay a pollutant in effort to drive small, mid-sized family cattle ranchers out of business. http://www.naturalnews.com/033537_hay_pollutant.html

Small farms would be forced to pay a $23,000 annual permit fee for green house gas emissions. The same flat fee amount as the mega corporation farms 1,000 times their size putting out 2,000 times the green house gases.

http://mfbf.org/legislative-news-briefs/2012/07/epa-greenhouse-gas-rules-spell-doom-for-agriculture/

It is interesting she quit after this came out. It is also interesting the post made no mention of it.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/epa-chief-steps-down-after-secret-email-account-is-exposed/

http://epaabuse.com/10471/news/what-is-epa-chief-lisa-jackson-hiding/
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 27th Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!