Follow this blog:
RSS

Employee outsources own job to read Reddit, earns a fortune

By | January 16, 2013, 5:35 AM PST

If businesses can save time and money by outsourcing jobs and services, why can’t employees do the same?

Perhaps this was the mindset of “Bob,” a developer based at a U.S. critical infrastructure company who was part of a case study released by Verizon. Bob, one of the top developers at the firm, was part of a security audit that exposed what the employee was actually doing — outsourcing his job to a Chinese developer.

The situation came to light when the company’s telecommunications supplier was called in after a basic virtual private network (VPN) was constructed to cater for staff to be able to work from home. The VPN logs showed that the corporate network was continually being accessed from Shenyang in China, which suggested that something dodgy was going on.

By using Bob’s credentials, the Chinese programmer was able to login and access the company’s main server. Recorded invoices showed that Bob had outsourced his work to a software consultancy firm in the Asian country, giving them his credentials and paying them only a fifth of his six-figure salary while he enjoyed his free time.

“The company’s IT personnel were sure that the issue had to do with some kind of zero day malware that was able to initiate VPN connections from Bob’s desktop workstation via external proxy and then route that VPN traffic to China, only to be routed back to their concentrator,” said Verizon. “Yes, it is a bit of a convoluted theory, and like most convoluted theories, an incorrect one.”

So what did Bob do with all of his spare time? He surfed, chatted, and procrastinated, as his browser history shows:

  • 9:00 a.m. –- Arrive and surf Reddit for a couple of hours. Watch cat videos.
  • 11:30 a.m. –- Take lunch.
  • 1:00 p.m. -– Ebay time.
  • 2:00p.m — Facebook updates, LinkedIn.
  • 4:30 p.m. -– End of day update e-mail to management.
  • 5:00 p.m. –- Go home

After further investigation into the programmer’s activities, Verizon found that Bob had pulled the same stunt on other companies, resulting in his middle-man job earning him a fortune in profit. Sadly for Bob, his company may be allowed to outsource work, but employees may not.

Thumbnail Credit: Flickr

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
13
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
Sacked ?
Presuming he got sacked.
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
16th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
the us chamber of commerce ultimate employee
wow, how mentally distorted american workers have become; let alone the employers.
Posted by affordablecomputerguy@...
16th Jan
+3 Votes
+ -
outsources own job
He is just a contractor using a subcontractor. What is the difference? It is only a formality. Verizon should give him a promotion and a raise for being such a genius.
Posted by ron@...
16th Jan
+2 Votes
+ -
He was just.....
Was he a contractor or an employee? If the latter then he probably can't do that due to clearances, etc. If a contractor then depending on the contract wording he may or may not be able to do this. Usually contractors are cleared to do whatever the work is and they alone are given usernames / passwords, etc. to do that work. I don't think the contract allows (or should be stated) that his access rights can't be shared.

He should have gotten his contractor to do what he could and then Bob integrates the pieces.
Posted by dave@...
Updated - 16th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
It Might Even Be Illegal
In most companies, there are policies that say you cannot give your login credentials to ANYONE. Maybe the company did a security background check on the employee but they did not do one on the person/company in China. Definitely NOT a formality. Employees do not have the right to subcontract.
Posted by hforman@...
16th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Up there for thinking
You have to give credit to this guy for thinking this one up. Pay someone 20 percent of your salary to do your job while you sit back and take the other 80 percent for doing nothing at all. Might be against company policies, but Australian banks have been outsourcing much of their data processing to india for many years, which is no different to what happened here.
Posted by mdppat64
16th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
AWESOME!
HAHA! This is awesome. Maybe I should outsource my 15,000km walk from Beijing to London that will be life-streamed over social media and live-streamed at various points. -> http://www.michaelleejohnson.com for more information. happy
Posted by mljonfoot
17th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Were you confused by the title?
I certainly was! I thought the guy's job was reading reddit(?!) and I'm not convinced he "earned a fortune" by outsourcing his job - he got paid his wage and got his job done, except he spent very little time actually working.
Clever, yes - sensible, no. Assuming he managed the issue of the quality of the outsourced work, he was bound to fall foul of company IT policy.
"Employee outsources own job to China, surfs web, but exposes company network" would have been better methinks, Charlie.
Posted by Raad@...
17th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Hire him or fire him?
I can't decide....
Posted by jayja1
17th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Kudos
Outside of the security issue(s), the worker performed his job from the employer's perspective. Imaginative, creative and resourceful. I agree, he should have been promoted. However, hind site is 20 20 as there are a few things he should have done to cover security + his surrogate activities.
Posted by Hal_9001
17th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Seems to me the difference here is...
that he was a worker, not a dept. manager. Companies have been outsourcing American jobs exactly like that for decades. If he was a Dept. manager, he would be getting a raise and a promotion, while cutting most of the jobs in the company at the same time.

Except for the security issues, it is a double standard. (But the security issues are no small matter!)
Posted by michaellashinsky@...
18th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
He's a lazy fool
If you are going to pull a stunt like this, you need to be spending your time making other money (lots of it), because -- duh! -- your company is going to find out sooner or later, and you'll be fired. And unemployable.
I also misunderstood the poor title, and assumed he'd somehow made lots of money reading Reddit while getting paid to do something else.
Posted by dmm99
23rd Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Not so smart
The point is, he was being paid to do his job, but he had to pay somebody else one fifth of his earnings. Therefore he was ending up with 4/5 of his income. Is that clever?he still had to go to work, but sat there wasting his time. I would imagine there would be some problem with business confidentiality, but that doesn't seem to have been mentioned.
Posted by kitemanmusic
24th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!