Follow this blog:
RSS

Drug giant’s full disclosure will aid healthcare, restore trust

By | October 16, 2012, 10:43 PM PDT

To dispel the secrecy that shrouds drug-industry trials, GlaxoSmithKline announced last week that it will make the trove of detailed raw data underlying its clinical trials available to researchers. Declan Butler reports for Nature News.

This is a huge step forward because data from clinical trials are rarely shared fully with other scientists — meaning doctors make important decisions about patients and care based on incomplete information.

Greater openness about clinical-trial data should help to speed up drug development, provide independent assessments of drug safety and efficacy and increase trust in industry science. It could also put an end to the scandals that, over the past few years, have seen almost every major drug company fined hundreds of millions of dollars for putting profits before patient safety and welfare, often through selective data reporting.

(In July, GSK reached a $3-billion settlement with U.S. authorities for fraud, including publishing “false and misleading” accounts of trials, and for hiding data on safety concerns.) Transparency is the only way forward for the industry.

GSK now intends to make available anonymized patient-level data for all trials it has carried out since 2007 for both approved and abandoned drugs (only post-2007 data is in formats suitable for sharing, the company says).

This is the first of such commitments for big players in the industry. Starting next year, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) intends to open up access to all new clinical-trial data sets received from industry for product registration.

[Via Nature News]

Image: GSK

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Janet Fang

About Janet Fang

Janet Fang is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang
Contributing Editor, Healthcare

Janet Fang has written for Nature, Discover and the Point Reyes Light. She is currently a lab technician at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. She holds degrees from the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Janet Fang

Janet Fang

Janet does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Full Disclosure
I wouldn't trust this company anymore than I would trust an oil company. I guarantee they have something up their sleeve. It's all a matter of time. To bad mankind will have to suffer so they can make some more money! Wouldn't it be nice if they could actually produce something that could cure something? I think mankind is smart enough to know there are ways to heal without suffering, have clean free energy without tearing up our planet to get it, to grow organic food to supply all the populations needs without polluting. I think this is something everyone on this planet should view and make your own decision as to what you want out of your world. www.thrivemovement.com
Posted by foolmeonce
17th Oct
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!