Follow this blog:
RSS

Crowdfunding: a good resource for architects?

By | February 5, 2013, 6:33 AM PST

Sure, we all know about crowdfunding successes in the realms of books and gadgets, or in the social innovation space. But what about buildings and infrastructure? Can a skyscraper or a bridge be built successfully with this type of 21st-century financial support?  Examples are popping up, from the 66-story BD Bacata Downtown in Bogota, Colombia (which will be partly owned by the local community), to a new pedestrian bridge in Rotterdam, the Netherlands (via the I Make Rotterdam project).

A new report, Crowdfunding Architecture, released on February 4 by the American Institute of Architects and prepared by massolution, makes a cogent case for matching large-scale building projects and pooled money from “the crowd.”

As the authors write, crowdfounding can have very specific advantages for architects. One particularly moving one is that it can “provide architects with the ability to work with local communities to discuss, develop, and then implement design ideas that benefit the members of the community while creating both short and long term job opportunities.”

The best part of the report, however, is that it provides an excellent and accessible primer for anyone to understand different models of crowdfunding, from donation-based, reward-based, or crowdfunding with financial returns. Yet it doesn’t shy away from the limitations of each for architects: challenges, the authors write, include overselling a property or the pressure of raising very large amounts of money (compared to, say, a Kickstarter campaign for a short documentary film).

The report also includes a helpful section that guides readers in forming their crowdfunding campaigns. The authors suggest, for instance, that communication of a project should include “strong video content; a written narrative; [a] campaign owner’s passion; multi-tiered broadcasting; and demographics-oriented communication.” Although the publication is geared towards architects, you certainly don’t have to be an architect to appreciate the detail and guidance it provides. (The white paper is available here in its entirety as a PDF).

Image: Stephen L. Harlow/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Reena Jana

About Reena Jana

Reena Jana was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Reena Jana

Reena Jana

Contributing Editor

Reena Jana has written for the New York Times, Wired, Harvard Business Review online, Fast Company, Architectural Record, Artforum, Time Out New York, Harper's Bazaar, and GQ. Previously, she was the innovation department editor at BusinessWeek. She holds degrees from Columbia University and Barnard College.

Follow her on Twitter.

Reena Jana

Reena Jana

Reena occasionally consults with companies, and when her writing discusses a corporation or other organization with which she has worked, she will disclose this fact. Reena does not hold any investments in the companies she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
interesting concept!
I believe that this could be a way of building consensus in the community which a new building was built. What better way than to have buy in from the community? That said, the architects would have to still jump through the permitting process. I'll be interested if this business model can survive in architecture.
Posted by Maksimuk
5th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Crowd Sourcing is good for objectors too
Just to say crowd sourcing with the appropriate PR techniques (including demos riotds and trolling) is good for opponents of schemes too and I would add world wide.

May the best win
Posted by cping500
6th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Brilliant idea!
Any opportunity to increase the options for building procurement, beyond the standard developer/ architect consultant has to be a good thing. Perhaps it is possible to eliminate the developer altogether for some building proposals and it could also bring creative "one off's" to fruition that would otherwise be impossible, primarily because the standard funding model is solely profit driven and therefore inherently limiting.
Posted by djshelley
3rd Mar
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!