Follow this blog:
RSS

China’s smog hits new highs (and lows)

By | January 14, 2013, 3:33 PM PST

China’s capital has been gripped for days by the worst air pollution on record, prompting the country to shut down factories and pull government cars off the road. Even the typically staid state media has provided widespread and critical coverage of the issue after measurements taken over the weekend exceeded the highest levels on the Air Quality Index.

On Saturday, a Twitter feed from the U.S. Embassy rated the air in central Beijing at a whopping 755 on an air quality index of 0 to 500, reported the New York Times. AQI, which the EPA uses to measure pollution, puts levels between 151 and 200 as unhealthy and anything over 301 as hazardous.

The Beijing government reported later that night levels of particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers, known as PM 2.5, that exceeded 900 micrograms per cubic meter. That’s similar levels found during London’s killer smog, which killed up to 12,000 people in 1952, the NYT noted.

PM 2.5 is a particle that’s small in size, but packs a punch. As pollution, it can spread over a large surface area and is known to carry toxic heavy metals, chemicals and organic pollutants. The EPA regulates PM2.5, recently setting the health standard at 12 micrograms per cubic meter.

As industry in China has boomed and more of its citizens begin to drive cars, air pollution has become an increasingly stubborn and expensive issue that has caused some Chinese cities to take action. For instance, Guangzhou said in September 2012 it would halve the number of new cars on its streets using license plate auctions and lotteries.

Air pollution has already exacted huge costs to the country’s economy. An MIT study released last year determined air pollution cost China’s economy $112 billion in 2005, nearly a five-fold increase from 1975. Exposure to PM 2.5 caused an estimated 8,572 premature deaths in Shanghai, Guangzhou, Xi’an and Beijing in 2012 and led to total economic losses of $1.08 billion in those cities, according to a joint study by Greenpeace East Asia and Peking University’s School of Public Health.

Another famously polluted city, Mexico City, has tried–with some success–to adopt urban sustainability projects, such as installing vertical gardens that function as both art and oxygenators as well as instituting policies to curb traffic, promote lower emission vehicles and promote public transportation.

Photos: Greenpeace East Asia

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Kirsten Korosec

About Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Contributing Editor

Kirsten Korosec has written for Technology Review, Marketing News, The Hill, BNET and Bloomberg News. She holds a degree from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. She is based in Tucson, Arizona.

Follow her on Twitter.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
26
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Global warming? Will the real Slim Shady please stand up.
The US is pretty bad, but some of these places are worse... These are some of the places we need incredibly strong environmental protections. Many of these Asian and Indian countries are severely overpopulated and are massive polluters and need to be controlled (more than the rest of the world). We need to start holding global polluters accountable for the smog they release on the rest of the world. We all need to work together to make the world a better place, and those that refuse to play nice should face the music.
Posted by i8thecat4
14th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
One quick solution...
The US should sell China more natural gas to pay down our debt. At least they could reduce the use of coal and still keep their economy going. Nuclear is their best bet and they are investing in the thorium fuel cycle.
Posted by kralspaces
14th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Natural gas? I'm not so sure on natural gas...
Fracking doesn't seem to be a viable solution, if it is poisoning our water table then it is far worse than anything we have ever done... How about solar on every rooftop??? If we came out with a requirement that all new roofs and any re-roofing must be done with solar, then 90% of our energy needs could be met within the next 50 years. They make solar shingles that snap into a wired rubber grid. And there are also PV panels. There are a lot of roofs in the world and it all adds up to a lot of solar real estate. There are more ways than just batteries to store that energy for times when the sun isn't shining (Heat, compressed air, etc. Perhaps burning stuff and nuclear are not the best answers).
Posted by i8thecat4
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
And who pays for it?
Oh great, its me again. Thanks liberals!
Posted by copracr
15th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Still not proven
While fracking has had issues with bad well seals and improper storage of fracking fluids which have polluted local well water, nobody has yet shown that the basic process of fracking has polluted any water table. Even EPA director Lisa Jackson said as much in an interview last April.

As for putting solar on every roof, it's one thing to pass a law and another to pay for it. It still costs thousands of dollars to put solar on a house, and most people don't have that much money laying around or else can't afford the monthly payments of taking out a loan. And solar by itself won't solve 90% of our energy needs since nighttime lasts an average of 50% of the day. We still need cheap storage, which nobody has a clue on how to do.
Posted by zackers
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
US is bad?
You may want to check your facts. The fact is that in a study from just over a year ago ( http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/datablog/2011/sep/26/global-air-pollution-who ) the US is actually in the bottom 10 as far as most polluted countries.
The US has some of the strictest regulations currently. We're not even allowed to drill for oil in our own backyard beside the oil rigs of the other less strict countries.
Posted by frd1963
15th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Bottom 10
The list is alphabetical.

The US rates well as do most developed, democratic nations.
Posted by shaunehunter
15th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
Water
Just buy your water in the US and you'll be fine. Avoid tap if at all possible.
Posted by QASIMARA
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Bring on the miners
Here is an excellent opportunity to employ the unemployed - West Virginia coal miners, that is! That smog is so thick you could cut it with a knife. So send a large group of American coal miners, armed with knives to cut out sections of smog and send it off to processing plants. Think of all the chemicals that could be extracted from these cubes of smog! Think of the boost to the Chinese economy, and how much money could be sent home by the newly employed miners (you'll note that WV coal and Chinese smog are about the same density and color?).
Posted by FreeloaderFred
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
wages
Unfortunately, Chinese wages are much less than our unemployment benefits.
Posted by frd1963
15th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Bring on the miners
... miner wld. have to be altruistically motivated... or ig'nan't soldiers...
Posted by QASIMARA
15th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Export our natural gas.
27. The main concern for environmentalists worldwide should be to cut the use of coal, especially in
antiquated plants. Here are the top ten coal burners:http://www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/what-are-the-top-10-coal-burning-countries-on-the-planet-whos-1.html

It is possible for the whole world to drastically cut coal burning and benefit the health of all. Coal pollution travels around the world. It is the worst fuel for pollution:http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/coalvswind/c02c.html

Producing and using natural gas is the best solution for base power, in conjunction with solar, wind, geothermal etc. There is plenty of natural gas all around the world, and it can be accessed with new and future technology. In the meantime old coal plants must be replaced with modern ones that can be switched to natural gas fuel when it is available.

Natural gas is the future of energy. It is replacing dirty old coal plants, and dangerous expensive nuclear plants. It will fuel cars, trucks, vans, buses, locomotives, aircraft, ships, tractors, air conditioners, engines of all kinds. It costs far less. It will help keep us out of more useless wars, where we shed our blood and money. It is used to make many products. It lowers CO2 emissions. Over 4,100 natural gas story links on my free blog. An annotated and illustrated bibliography of live links, updated daily. The worldwide picture of natural gas. Read in 66 nations.
ronwagnersrants.blogspot.com
Posted by ronwagn
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
China has more natural gas than the US
It's generally believed that China has more shale gas than even the US. What they don't have are the geological surveys needed to know where to drill, nor the expertise in the fracking process (see http://www.technologyreview.com/news/508146/china-has-plenty-of-shale-gas-but-it-will-be-hard-to-mine/ ). They could do all this in a few years if they wanted to, and maybe growing concern over air pollution will be a big incentive.

There are lots of places such as Japan that don't have any natural gas resources, and there is growing momentum in the US to start exporting our gas.
Posted by zackers
15th Jan
+4 Votes
+ -
What! Smog in China!
According to all of the global warming treaties China is a poor undeveloped nation with no need for pollution controls.

This is all lies! Lies I tell you.
Posted by Hates Idiots
15th Jan
+2 Votes
+ -
But, but, but...
...didn't just yesterday SmartPlanet tell us that China is ahead of us in "green energy"? Sure doesn't look like it.

http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/bulletin/clean-energy-in-2012-china-surged-us-sagged/10140
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 15th Jan
0 Votes
+ -
Are you not able to comprehend how both can be true?
Newton said "If I have seen farther it is by standing on the shoulders of giants."

You sir appear to be lying face down on the ground.
Posted by Cmd_Line_Dino
15th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
Explain it to him.
And perhaps the rest of us will learn something too.
Posted by adornoe
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
I'd be more likely to believe it...
...if they weren't building coal-fired powerplants at the rate of the size of all of Britain, each and every year.

Unlike the Green Progressives, I pay more attention to what people are actually doing instead of their PCPR.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 16th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
does Nigel Tufnel work at the EPA?
"755 on an air quality index of 0 to 500"
Posted by frylock
15th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Did your reading not even reach the end of the 2nd sentence?
as it says
"after measurements taken over the weekend exceeded the highest levels on the Air Quality Index."
Posted by Cmd_Line_Dino
15th Jan
-1 Votes
+ -
Then, perhaps something is amiss...
and, the index is being defined at a level to scare people to death, or at least to scare them into taking action.

If the index can be overshot, then, perhaps the levels are being artificially defined way too low.

The EPA has an agenda, and their agenda is to control what people do, with anything that uses energy. A lot of the people at the EPA are partisan hacks, who will use whatever power they have, to advance their agenda, part of that agenda being defining air quality indexes, and passing regulations where anybody gets close to the higher limits of their indexes. Having the EPA in control of air quality/air pollution, water quality/pollution, what constitutes clean energy and clean fuels, is like having a wolf telling sheep farmers how they can't have fences around their farms.

The EPA has very little credibility.

What's happening in China, won't have the EPA showing any kind of concern, since their agenda is mostly about controlling the lives of the American people. EPA standards and indexes aren't necessary for people to determine that, the air quality is pizz-poor in China.
Posted by adornoe
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
Cover
...and here I thought it was intentional because US satellites could not see what is going on in China's capital because of the smokefog... silly me.
Posted by QASIMARA
15th Jan
+1 Vote
+ -
It is intentional for self protection.
China is a poor undeveloped country. The UN and the global warming gurus have decreed it. So it must be fact. Get used to it.

This pollution nonsense is all lies. The US is trying to get a poor country to drop its smoke screen. Their key defensive mechanism.
Posted by Hates Idiots
15th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
And all this could be yours
This can be what Americas cities will look like if it is up to GOP and their policy of scaling back or even worse getting rid of the EPA.
Posted by dennyinusa
15th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
Oh, geez! There is always the usual ijiot who will blame anthing and
everything on republicans.

The EPA, as it stands, is part of the many reasons why the U.S. is rapidly going down the "chitter". The massive number of regulations coming from the radical people at the EPA has many companies either going out of business, or having to ship operations overseas, where they don't have to comply with those many intrusive regulations.

You can go ahead and have your EPA cake, but you can't expect that you'll be able to eat any of that cake when millions of jobs are lost, and many thousands of businesses have to shut down or have had to move abroad because of the EPA regulations.

Any actions by any government agencies, always come with repercussions. The EPA is one of the most radical government agencies on the planet, and people like you are part of the "low information" voter many people keep talking about.
Posted by adornoe
15th Jan
-2 Votes
+ -
There it is...
My first 2013 sighting of Adornoe and his stunning ignorance and nonsense.

Blather on pal.

My advice to those commenters who persistently and sincerely counter his nonsense is just ignore him/her.

He has no real opinion or point of view ... it's all about goading and provoking others and enjoying their frustration as he never concedes a single point no matter how overwhelmingly countered.
Posted by Cmd_Line_Dino
16th Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!