Follow this blog:
RSS

China tackling Internet addiction as boy poisons parents for gaming ban

By | February 22, 2013, 3:39 AM PST

It's not just China.

China has announced plans to define Internet addiction in young people and to devise methods for preventing it, China Daily is reporting.

The initiative comes following one extreme case in which a 14-year-old boy admitted poisoning his family after his mother banned computer games.

“Internet addiction has become a serious problem in China,” said Li Jianwei from the Ministry of Culture. “Although some rules restricting students from playing online games have been introduced, the problem has not been solved completely.”

The Culture Ministry is one of 15 groups that will jointly take three years to implement a program.

“Meanwhile, regulations on Internet cafes and online game companies will become stricter, and a stronger supervision system will be implemented,” the article noted.

“The unhealthy content online, such as violence and obscenity, has damaged young people physically and mentally,” said Wang Ping, managing director of the Chinese Society for Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Research, a non-governmental organization. “But what symptoms define Internet addiction? How to diagnose young addicts, and at what level of addiction, is still vague.”

In the poisoning case in Ziyang, Sichuan province, the teenager is believed to have poured farm chemicals into family food on Feb. 2. His parents, older brother (so much for single child families) and sister-in-law have been discharged from the hospital after suffering stomach ailments.

Photo from Chrispirillo.com

A dose of related SmartPlanet stories:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Control
This is the kind of control many US officials envy about other countries, without excluding N. Korea.
Posted by ignaceous
22nd Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Agreed
Now that the 2nd Amendment is no longer politically sacrosanct, once it's done with we will be free to address the real causes of violence like this too.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
22nd Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Control
The 2nd amendment is politically sacrosanct. It won't be done with in your lifetime. Crackpots like Cuomo and Feinstein have destroyed any chance of reasonable compromise on gun laws, so there will probably be no change. We can't let them get their foot in the door.

Best look at these other issues now, as that's something worth while that might fly. NB Experience shows you can't leave it up to the parents. They don't care.
Posted by Hans Schmidt
23rd Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
I wish I had your confidence.
The 2nd Amendment is but a few Supreme Court justices away from structural erosion. There's little doubt that the next judges to be selected by the sitting President will be much more amenable to the idea of considering "international consensus" beyond our Constitution in their rulings. The 2nd Amendment will be quickly chipped away at until irrelevant after that.

But the upside (if you can call it that, and I don't) will be that once the 2nd Amendment is gone, the 1st and other Amendments will be weakened as well. That will empower future administrations with a different outlook to start working over what many deem as undesirable aspects of the 1st and other Amendments. Outlawing "dangerous" entertainment content will certainly be one of them. After all, nobody "needs" pornography and graphic violence to survive and thrive, any more than individuals need assault weapons.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
23rd Feb
-1 Votes
+ -
Game addiction
Glad to see China making a move, I hope other countries get on with it too. It's hard to not notice that many kids and adults are wasting their lives on make believe worlds within computers. So many people get out of school with no skills at all except how to win a game. Many of my friends came out of school with abilities to get right into sewing, creative design, electronics, woodcraft and wood construction, welding, pipe fitting, automotive repair. There is still a lot of that but not nearly as much. When I was a boy my father warned me about gambling. Those addicted to that would work and gamble and had no homes or good family life, it all went into their addiction. This computer gaming is not unlike that. I really wish it would go away. Real life is adventurous enough. If it isn't then you're not getting out much.
Posted by radiodog4@...
22nd Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
No Knee-Jerk laws
I hope that they are sophisticated enough to be able to sort this out without banning all and everyone. Too often, that is what happens.
Posted by 16Tons
22nd Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!