Follow this blog:
RSS

Chicago debuts smog-eating street

By | October 21, 2012, 3:04 PM PDT

In an effort to clean up its city streets, the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) has set out to create the “greenest street in America” and short of closing off the road all together and turning it into a park, they seem to have done just that.

Officials from the deparment have completely transformed a two-mile stretch of Cermak Road and Blue Island Avenue in the city’s Pilsen neighborhood, an industrial section of the city that is frequented by trucks passing through.

To start, the street’s pavement has been replaced with a new variety that actually cleans the surface of the road while removing pollution from the surrounding air.  Photocatalytic cement removes nitrogen oxide gases from the air through a catalytic reaction driven by UV light, according to CDOT. In addition, a slew of recycled materials were blended into both the street and sidewalk’s pavement.

Bioswales, rain gardens, and permeable pavements were also incorporated into the street’s design to filter storm water in order to relieve Chicago’s sewer system and keep polluted water out of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan. The city’s officials estimate that the system will divert 80 percent of the average annual rainfall from the sewers.

[via Inhabitat]

Images: CDOT

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Sarah Korones

About Sarah Korones

Sarah Korones was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2012 to 2013.

Sarah Korones

Sarah Korones

Contributing Editor

Sarah Korones is a freelance writer based in New York. She has written for Psychology Today and Boston's Weekly Dig. She holds a degree from Tufts University.

Follow her on Twitter.

Sarah Korones

Sarah Korones

Sarah Korones does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
13
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Carbon Footprint of this ?
So they basically spent a fcuk load of money and burned a bucket of fuel producing loads of CO2, digging up a sidewalk to produce the same effect as planting a few thousand tree's and hanging some air cleaning catalyst panels on some walls.

"Bioswales, rain gardens, and permeable pavements were also incorporated into the streets design to filter storm water in order to relieve Chicagos sewer system and keep polluted water out of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan"

-- The do realized it rains *A LOT* in Chicago - how long until this is over-whelmed and still puts untreated storm run-off into the Lake ?? 15 minutes ?

Some better water treatment for rain run-off, or cleaner pavements/streets so it doesn;t get polluted in the first case, and some better vehicle emission standards seems a more practical way forward. How much effort is needed to maintain the Bioswales, rtain gardens and how long until the permeable pavements are permeated with the stuff you are filtering and are no longer effective and need dug up again.............
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
Updated - 22nd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
Reminds me off when
NBC flew a camera crew up to the arctic, complete with power generators, lighting, cameras, satellie uplinks, etc to show us how global warming was harming the arctic. Why is artic ice melting? Because NBC is flooding it with hot spotlights, electrical generators, air and auto exhaust, etc.

The only green road, like the only secure computer, is the one that no one uses.
Posted by bb_apptix
22nd Oct
0 Votes
+ -
So where's the nitrogen going?
Hopefully the stormwater diversion includes some type of treatment to take up the nitrogen that's being fixed from the air. Otherwise, they're releasing nutrient enriched water somewhere-groundwater/surface water, somewhere.
Posted by Diveguy7317
22nd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
No mention of "fixing" the nitrogen...
It just said that the pavement "removes" nitrogen oxides using a process of catalysis. The nitro could go anywhere, with that description, including just back into the air as molecular nitrogen gas (which is what air is, to 7 parts out of 10)
Posted by Lightning Joe
22nd Oct
0 Votes
+ -
SMOG EATING STREET
THe idea is a novel initiative. But the prevetion of storm water from entering the River will have disastrous consequences fo9r the cities downstream who draw fderinking water fromn it. even though it ,may need to bbe purified.
Posted by CEEYESSAAR
22nd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
i think i'm late
i came late to the conversation; i see others are asking what we do with the nitrogen and one other knows about the benefit of trees. i live in manhattan and want our city to plant trees on each and every avenue and street, 40' apart except for those places the trees would be an obstruction. we can't afford them? we can't afford the consequences of not doing it. even when we get smog eating streets they won't become redundant; they will go on being soothing.
Posted by Sunon@...
22nd Oct
0 Votes
+ -
In the door zone
Yes, but it's a pity they put the bike lane right past all those parked cars, so that any suddenly opened door either spikes the cyclist in the chest, or forces her to swerve blindly into the path of motor vehicles that expect her to ride on the narrow, bumpy strip between the two white lines.

If those capacious motor lanes were made a little narrower, motorists would slow and drive with greater care - leading to less pollution produced and fewer accidents with pedestrians - and there would be room for a painted median between the parked cars and cycle track, keeping cyclists out of the 'door zone'.
Posted by Wheeliefine
Updated - 23rd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
To take your thoughts a step further.
I am curious how do the bike riders feel about riding on bricks and not smooth pavement?

I can see pot holes opening up in the bike lane after a few Chicago winters of ice getting in between the bricks.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 23rd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
Thinking further is what the planners should've done
The type of surface is very important to cyclists: some, like cast concrete, feel almost frictionless, while certain kinds of tarmac are like cycling through treacle. Also, surfaces behave very differently when wet, damp or oily. Bricks are bad: as you note below, they'll soon be misaligned, and every bump will noticeably slow you down. Before long, cyclists will be diverting on to the main roadway to avoid the potholes and extra effort, which won't be understood by motorists of course, resulting in a whole bunch of unhappy road users. Quite apart from cyclists' risk of being speared by one of those car doors.
Posted by Wheeliefine
23rd Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
This is the problem with many urban planners.
The one size fits all mentality of many urban planners do not realize or care that what works great in Florida or Georgia might not work in a city like Chicago because of a little thing called winter.

The poor fit of those bricks is obviously to allow water drainage, but it will be a pothole maker in just one winter. Properly fit paver sidewalks need routine repair in the frost belt. It is a fact of life. This project is a bricklayers job security dream.

In the end this is a bureaucratic, big government, dream project.

An annual busy work, job making project sucking up taxpayers road maintenance funds every year because of ongoing maintenance brought on by poor planning.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 23rd Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, that's another thing
You're right that the bricks allow drainage of surface water - so all the loose debris, oil and grit from that smooth expanse of asphalt will wash into the gutter-disguised-as-a-cycle-lane. Great for motorists; lousy for anyone on a bike.
Posted by Wheeliefine
Updated - 23rd Oct
0 Votes
+ -
CHicagooooooo
I work in this neighborhood and I have seen this project under construction for about 2 years. I would recommend to CDOT that brick pavers be used FOR THE SIDEWALK and not for the street. The bricks have been replaced in front of the bus stops because the weight of the bus damaged the pavers. Fail.

Also, the pavers are not the worst thing to ride your bike on, but I observe bikers riding on the smoother pavement when there is no traffic.

When it rains, I have not observed larger puddles due to this new construction.

All in all, this is a good project with room for improvement.
Posted by zachary2001
24th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Cycling safety
While I laud the approach of thinking outside the box, I would like to hear from the designers anjd from cyclists. From Paris- Roubaix, I thought that bricks are particularly slick when wet. Given that and the gaps between bricks, it would seem to rule out cycling for bikes other than with fat tires and mountain bike treads. Why not bricks under the road surface instead. ? The person who suggested brick sidewalks was not thinking of the hazards for pedestrians wearing heels.
Posted by sr2594@...
25th Oct
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!