Follow this blog:
RSS

Breakthrough could carry solar, wind power long distances

By | December 12, 2012, 3:00 AM PST

We know we have a problem with carbon emissions mucking up the climate.

But switching over to renewable energy isn’t that easy. For one, many places that are good for making renewable energy — windy plains or sunny deserts — aren’t necessarily near big cities, where the energy is needed.

And what happens when you try to transport energy hundreds of miles from the energy source to the big city? It loses some of its power. At least today’s dominant form of power, alternating current (AC), does.

But Thomas Edison championed direct current (DC), and it looks like he might be vindicated.

Up till now, DC was not used on large power grids because of the energy it loses when carried over long distances and for fear it would be prone to catastrophic breakdowns. (More on that below.)

But a new type of power, high-voltage DC, or HVDC, could carry power long distances with minimal loss — and a new device called a hybrid HVDC breaker would help prevent those huge breakdowns.

Developed by Swiss power technology company ABB, the breaker has only been tested in the lab, but ABB claims the hybrid HVDC breaker will make possible “the grid of the future,” which National Geographic News describes as “a massive, super-efficient network for distributing electricity that would interconnect not just nations but multiple continents.”

What the hybrid HVDC breaker is and why it’s important

The thing about HVDC, or any direct current for that matter, is that, unlike AC, it’s always on.

That makes it much trickier to regulate.

“When you have a large grid and you have a lightning strike at one location, you need to be able to disconnect that section quickly and isolate the problem, or else bad things can happen to the rest of the grid,” such as a catastrophic blackout, ABB chief technology officer Prith Banerjee told Nat Geo News. “But if you can disconnect quickly, the rest of the grid can go on working while you fix the problem.”

This new breaker can redirect and shut down a current using a series of both mechanical and electronic circuit-breaking devices. And it can do that with surges equivalent to what a one gigawatt power plant (big enough to serve one million U.S. homes) might generate — all in less time than the blink of an eye.

What the grid could look like

So, back to the renewable energy part.

The amount of energy that renewables can now provide is a fraction of what we need because the place where the energy is generated is so far from where the energy is needed. But Narain Hingorani, a fellow with the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers who researches power-transmission, says that hybrid HVDC breakers could help us capitalize on renewable energy.

As Nat Geo reports:

HVDC cables could be laid along the ocean floor to transmit electricity from floating wind farms that are dozens of mile offshore, far out of sight of coastal residents. HVDC lines equipped with hybrid breakers also would be much cheaper to bury than AC, because they require less insulation, Hingorani says.

It could also make viable wind farms and solar installations in the Midwest and Rocky Mountain area, and HVDC cables could be run underground.

Related on SmartPlanet:

via: National Geographic News

photo: HVDC transmission lines in New Zealand (Paul Moss/Wikimedia)

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Laura Shin

About Laura Shin

Laura Shin is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

Contributing Editor

Laura Shin has written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Los Angeles Times, Audubon and SolveClimate.com. She is currently a senior editor at LearnVest.com. Previously, she worked at Newsweek, the New York Times and Wall Street Journal. She holds degrees from Stanford University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Follow her on Twitter.

Laura Shin

Laura Shin

In the unlikely event that Laura has a professional or financial relationship with a company she writes about, it will be prominently disclosed.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Interesting to watch where this goes.
If proven efficient, safe, reliable and cost effective this could have a huge impact on all power transmission, regardless of source.

Locally I am thinking of the hydro power in Quebec that is currently under utilized because it is so remote from where it is needed. There is a big fight going on in New Hampshire over the controversial Northern Pass Transmission Line Project to bring power down from Quebec.

Please keep us up to date on future developments you see on this.
Posted by Hates Idiots
12th Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
Northern Pass Transmission Line Project
I believe if you do a bit of research you will find this is a totally Political issue rather then a technical one. It's not really Quebec power. It's from the province of Labrador, specifically Churchill Power Project and under study Muskrat Falls Project. True many control dams are in Quebec but they funnel the water down to Churchill Falls in Labrador where the power plant is. The power plant has been operating at a loss for many years due to a long term federal contract on power fees that was to pro Quebec. Quebec has been purchasing the power below cost, then selling it to New Hampshire at a huge profit. To that end Labradors new Muskrat Falls project is to build a submarine transmission cable to Nova Scotia and there by traditional transmission to US markets to do an end run around Quebec. Quebec not wanting to lose their huge royalty profits are fighting the high expense of a submarine transmission cable that will bypass their province and thus their royalties
Posted by csumbler
Updated - 12th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Good info.
Thanks.
Posted by Hates Idiots
12th Dec
+4 Votes
+ -
don't get too excited
this is only marginal. It's important for the company producing it, but it won't affect or be used in much of the infrastructure. HVDC transmission is already used in various places for high power transmission over fixed links (e.g. between countries' systems), but local distribution will always be AC since using high voltage/'low' current is the only way to reduce the line losses and then you need to step down the volts - and up the current - for the local system and the customer (transformers only work with AC, and you don't want 30000 volts coming into your home - neither do you want to have to replace all your home appliances). HVDC transmission requires a big (i.e. large power-handling capability) DC->AC converter (essentially a DC motor driving an alternator) and although it's almost as efficient as possible, it still means losses which you don't have in the present system. Transformers are very efficient already, so it's a lot of trouble for a small gain, if any. Wind turbines produce AC, because alternators are more efficient and cheaper (to buy, to maintain) than dynamos. Edison's distribution system was a failure - it couldn't send power efficiently over more than a few hundred yards - for a practical system, it required hundreds of small power stations 'near' to the customers, rather than small local transformers. That's why we got Tesla's and Westinghouse's generation and distribution system, and that won't ever change.
Posted by RHambeau
12th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
How to Integrate with AC?
Not discussed is how DC would integrate with existing AC devices and infrastructure. Transformers, which inherently depend on AC, are mighty convenient in allowing stepdown from HV transmission to lower point-of-use voltages. Also, turbine generators, driven by water, wind or steam (boiled by nuclear or coal) inherently produce AC, and I doubt these are going away.
Posted by lexchis
12th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
I'd like to know more...
Perhaps it is beyond the scope of this article, but I'd like to know more about how HVDC overcomes the drawbacks of lower DC voltage.

I know that Edison envisioned generating and distributing DC, but at the lower voltages we'd all have to live within a few miles of the generating station, and that the diameter of the conductors required would be huge. That would have been the landscape of the U.S. power grid had not Tesla come along and pointed out the great efficiency of AC.

It makes good intuitive sense, too. Current is electrons (or electron "holes") moving in a conductor, and it's far easier to achieve this motion by "jiggling" the electrons back and forth (AC) than it is to drive them all the way from the source to the point of usage (DC).

Somehow, high DC voltage apparently overcomes these obstacles. I wonder how it does that, and I have to admit to being just a bit dubious!
Posted by omb00900@...
12th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
You have access to a huge percentage of the world's knowledge...
...so look it up!

Electricity has a lot more components than moving electrons...
Posted by wizoddg
12th Dec
+2 Votes
+ -
It doesn't overcome those drawbacks
It uses high voltage (HV) DC rather than HV AC to overcome a different drawback. AC transmission depends on transmission lines (usually a conductor suspended above the earth) - and inherently these induce/generate large currents in the earth under the line, leading to power loss, because the earth isn't a great conductor. You lose less power with DC - the only real loss is the resistance of the current-carrying conductor, a thick copper or aluminum wire, since there are no induced currents with DC. But then you introduce another loss, if you want a practical system - you still have to turn the HV DC into AC. You do this with an inverter, but this introduces its own loss. Depending on the relative magnitude of the various losses in the systems, you can win a little by going DC. A few percent of several hundred Gigawatts is still a lot of power, and it might be worth your while to save it if the conversion from DC to AC doesn't cost too much, in infrastructure or in overall efficiency. This is an engineering trade-off, it's not black-and-white.
Posted by RHambeau
12th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Hydro Quebec Already Has DC Transmission
There already is a high voltage DC line supplying New England with Hydro Quebec power. It operates at 450KV, supplies about 2000 MW and is close to 1000 miles long with the terminus in Princeton, Massachusetts, where it is electronically converted to AC before joining the grid. This line is at least 20 years old. I woulld guess it has all the protective relays and breakers any AC transmission line has.
Posted by support@...
Updated - 13th Dec
+1 Vote
+ -
Not according to HydroQuebec
According to HydroQuebec, it's a 450kV AC line with a phase converter at the other end.
Posted by mheartwood
12th Dec
Posted by support@...
Updated - 13th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
'switching over to renewable energy isn't easy.'
Bull. Nor is it difficult, it just requires the will to do so...and the understanding that doing so can preserve our hydrocarbon reserves for better use.

Our best bet is space based solar--which we've known how to do since 1975, but due to manipulated costing of current technologies, it has always been made to appear more expensive. This permits generation off-planet, so much of the inefficiency in conversion is dumped as heat BEFORE it reaches our ecosphere.

High Voltage DC transmission lines have been in wide use for decades.
Posted by wizoddg
12th Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!