Follow this blog:
RSS

Better Place closes up shop in U.S., Australia

By | February 6, 2013, 2:29 PM PST

Electric car infrastructure company Better Place is winding down its U.S. and Australian operations to focus on its two core markets: Israel and Denmark.

Better Place will close its U.S. headquarters, located in Palo Alto, Calif., and says it will limit any further investment in Australia beyond its current commitments. The company indicates it could resume its battery-swapping infrastructure plans in these markets when circumstances permit.

Better Place was founded in 2005 by Israeli entrepreneur Shai Agassi to solve the limited range of battery-powered electric vehicles. As I’ve noted before, the limited range of today’s batteries has resulted in range anxiety, the fear an electric vehicle will run out of juice and leave its driver stranded. It’s been one factor that has slowed EV sales.

Agassi’s vision was to build up a network of EV charging spots and battery-switching stations, which would allow drivers to swap out a depleted battery for a new one within minutes and extend the car’s range.

The idea has gained traction in markets like Israel and Denmark, where EV sales are gaining momentum, said Better Place. But it never really took off in the United States.

The company, once a darling among investors that was valued at $2.25 billion at the time of its last funding round, also has gone through several leadership changes in recent months.

Agassi was replaced as CEO in October by Evan Thornley, who, at the time, was CEO of Better Place Australia. Just three months later, Thornley was ousted and Idan Ofer, chairman of the company’s board, assumed an executive chairman role. Alan Gelman, global CFO for Better Place was supposed to manage the day-to-day operations. However, today’s statement from Better Place listed Dan Cohen, the former vice president for strategic initiatives, as its CEO.

Photo: Better Place

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Kirsten Korosec

About Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Contributing Editor

Kirsten Korosec has written for Technology Review, Marketing News, The Hill, BNET and Bloomberg News. She holds a degree from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. She is based in Tucson, Arizona.

Follow her on Twitter.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Seems like a good idea
I always thought this seemed like a good idea, but without the auto companies adopting a standard for interchangeable batteries, it's unlikely to work.
Posted by AlanLaRue
7th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
The status of EVs, is like a piece of ice surviving inside the sun.
Not a chance!

Here we go, people, the end of the EVs is near:

Japanese carmakers drop battery electric-car development

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/4/goodbye-prius-japan-carmakers-drop-electric-car-de/

From the article:

"Because of its shortcomings driving range, cost and recharging time the electric vehicle is not a viable replacement for most conventional cars, said Nissans vice chairman, Takeshi Uchiyamada, in a Reuters report. We need something entirely new. "

So, even Nissan, which was mentioned in the article, is giving up on EVs.

Anyone looking to own an EV, is likely going to end up with no support in the near future for those vehicles, and current support is virtually invisible in the areas where they are sold. People should be insisting on a guarantee that, if a company pulls out of the EV market before the warranty period for the automobile is up, that they will get their full purchase refunded for the vehicle.
Posted by adornoe
7th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
Another example of EV overreach
EVs are optimal for repetitive daily commutes of a finite distance; a scenario where a user can confidently leave home with a full charge, drive it to work or errands during the day within its range capability, and return home to recharge again overnight. Nobody is going to be satisfied with a car that they must constantly monitor for range and then find a place to charge or change out the battery.

Nobody (beyond those who want one for their eco-vanity) who regularly needs a single car to travel more than 100 miles a day is going to seriously consider an EV, even if charging stations are available anywhere. Placing stations like this all over really isn't going to make EVs substantially more popular than they are. Wasn't going to happen.

EVs will only retain popularity with short-range commuters or for wealthy people considering a 2nd or 3rd car.

I think that EVs should be sold on the basis of what they are good at; efficient short-range transportation for people who travel less than 100 miles a day, and stop trying to convince people that they're going to be taking cross-country trips in them.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
7th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
But, if all they will be good for is short distances, then, prices should
reflect the limited usage, which for an EV to even begin to be thought as practical in any way, means thet, they can't cost more than a go-cart or a golf-cart.
Posted by adornoe
7th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
I wouldn't agree with that.
The vast majority of cars today are driven less than 20 miles a day, and all of them cost far more than a golf cart.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
8th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!