Follow this blog:
RSS

Ben and Jerry’s certified as a socially responsible business

By | October 24, 2012, 4:15 PM PDT

Ben & Jerry’s, the ice cream company with soul, is now a B Corporation. B Corporations are legally allowed and required by certification to make business decisions that consider social responsibility as well as obligations to shareholders. Companies seeking B Corp designation must meet and maintain rigorous standards of social and environmental performance, accountability, and transparency.

The company is the first wholly-owned subsidiary to become a B Corp, something of a happy ending to a story watched carefully by the industry when Ben and Jerry’s was sold to Unilever after bowing to shareholder pressure in 2000. Although the famously socially conscious ice cream makers have continued to be as crunchy as their ice cream flavors, fans and supporters worried about what could have happened after the aquisition by Unilever.

FastCo.Exist’s Alex Goodmark explains,

The outrage is over what could have happened; that the iconoclastic founders couldn’t do what they and their customers wanted with the company. Co-Founder Ben Cohen referred to the acquisition as a “forced marriage.”

The case of Ben and Jerry’s proved that existing law was too narrowly focused on shareholder rights to protect the essence of a company, the values, the way of doing business. Unilever could have ended many of the social practices, even though they didn’t. (They did downsize however.) It’s a situation other social entrepreneurs want to avoid like an IRS audit.

The company’s certification survey and scoring are available on the B Labs (the non profit that certifies B Corporations) site so that anyone and everyone cab feel good about supporting Ben and Jerry’s.

Via: FastCompany, CSRWire

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Whatever "Socially Conscious" means...
proved that existing law was too narrowly focused on shareholder rights to protect the essence of a company

Sounds like a case of blue-on-blue. "We support the little guy, unless the little guy supports stuff that we don't support; and the stuff we support is vague and nebulous pablum based on phrases like "Socially Conscious".
Posted by sandmich
27th Oct
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!