Follow this blog:
RSS

Artist envisions drone-proof city

By | February 7, 2013, 7:00 AM PST

We’ve heard all about them. Drones used to spy on European farms, pint-sized Hornet helicopters employed to oust insurgents, and the privacy concerns that follow the use of such technology.

How would you feel about living in a city where drones aren’t able to function?

That’s the idea behind conceptual artist Asher J. Kohn’s “Shura City” design. Keep in mind it is a purely speculative design, which muses over what construction factors could be used to either confuse or render drone technology useless.

Envisioning several different ideas, Kohn describes a number of features:

Buildings: Concrete being the material of choice, the artist says that “the backbone of the city must be highly structured yet retain elements of randomness,” in order to confuse surveillance drones and make tracking a resident’s movements more difficult.

Windows: Fashioned from multicolored blocks of glass, the windows would be constructed not to hamper someone looking out, but keep people from looking in.

Roof: The concept design includes a shared roof that would aim to keep the entire area at roughly the same temperature in order to prevent drones detecting individual heat signatures.

Towers: Minarets — apart from being what the artist calls “a symbol of the inhabitants” would also be constructed in order to make drone passes difficult and dangerous for low-fliers.

Cooling towers: Otherwise known as badgirs, these powers would suck air in through a chimney and cool it before redistribution — once again hiding human heat signatures.

There is logic within elements of the design, which appears to be focused around obscuring residents from surveillance rather than providing active defense against the military use of drones. Kohn commented:

“Drones are a way to use the city. Architects will have to interact with them and create built environments that will either promote or inhibit their use. At this stage, political questions that define who we are as a society and who we include in a society are part-and-parcel of talk on drones. I hope to demonstrate how architects, lawyers, and countless other professions and labors can interact with drones instead of simply being subject to them.”

(Hat tip: PopSci)

Image credit: Asher J. Kohn

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
I don't understand...
... the point of this article. It looks like you want to assist the enemy by spreading information to help them avoid surveillance.

Besides, all of these defensive measures would be easily defeated once a drone recognized they were in use.
Posted by Cabo Wabo Addict
8th Feb
+3 Votes
+ -
It's been done.
None of this is new. And, technology was in place several decades ago to make any of this obsolete. That's why there are so many underground bases and installations that are completely hidden. Once you know WHERE something is, you can see pretty much whatever you want in the right spectrum or resonance. Privacy is a concept much like Justice. It only exists as a political tool.
Posted by victortweed
Updated - 8th Feb
-1 Votes
+ -
The Enemy
Edit: I meant this as a reply to Cabo Wabo Addict. In the heat of my disgust at his comment, I clicked the wrong button. Forgive me.

I voted your comment up. I want everyone with common sense who reads this article to see your comment and wonder the same things I did. Who is this enemy that needs to google how to build a drone proof city? Is he really that much of an enemy that he can't think of this himself? And lastly, why oh why are you logging onto a site called 'smartplanet' and making comments like this?
Posted by Mugsybalony
Updated - 11th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
this is why
artists shouldn't engage in city planning
Posted by frylock
8th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
Obsolete
Already.
Posted by wizoddg
8th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
I guess artists...
...have never heard of GPS or facial recognition...

I do like the one-way windows, though.

Oh, and the POINT is not to "help the enemy," but to preserve individual privacy -- a worthy goal.
Posted by Lightning Joe
10th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!