Follow this blog:
RSS

Are airport body scanners coming to your office building?

By | February 13, 2013, 6:41 AM PST

Airport body scanners: they are seen by travelers as an invasion of privacy and a potential health hazard. And travelers in the United States cheered when the U.S. Transportation Security Administration announced the body scanners, produced by Rapiscan Systems, would be removed from U.S. airports and replaced by scanners that use low-energy radio waves and produce less revealing images. But if you work for the United States government, you might not have seen the last of the controversial machines.

That’s because TSA is now stuck with more than 200 fully-functioning, expensive body scanners ($140,000 each). So TSA will just swallow the loss of $40 million for purchasing a poor product, right? Not so fast. “We are working with other government agencies to find homes for them,” TSA spokesman David Castelveter told Federal Times. “There is an interest clearly by [the Department of Defense] and the State Department to use them — and other [federal] agencies as well.”

It doesn’t seem as if TSA thought this through. TSA is removing the scanner from airports because they expose passengers to radiation and take nearly nude images of them. Moving the scanners to office buildings, where the same people would use the scanner each day and therefore be exposed more regularly to radiation than an occasional passenger and coworkers could see your body scan image, doesn’t make sense.

It’s admirable that the government is making efforts not to waste the machines. But sometimes in government, as in business, it’s best to cut your losses.

Photo: Flickr/niiicedave

[Via The Atlantic, Federal Times]

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
15
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+3 Votes
+ -
IRT Office scanners
Well...the scanner manufacturers have to make money somehow...since TSA is disenchanted with the scanners. The devices could be showing up on Gov't Surplus auction sites any time now.

Maybe the scanners should work for both entering and exiting buildings...that way you could see who was stealing paperclips.

My instincts tell me this is just a bad idea. Back in the '60s, there was a shoe store chain called Brown's Boots, that had x-ray machines installed so people could get their feet x-rayed (not sure how this would help you buy a pair of shoes, but there you go). The machines were removed when it was discovered that x-rays were not necessarily good for you.

Scanners at building entrances is a similar idea.
Posted by CrimeDog
Updated - 13th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
bugs
I'll add to the discussion here.

Having reported on and researched software defects over several years I'm not convinced that these machines are safe for human health, nor that they are entirely effective security measures.

There's a massive underreporting of deaths related to medical devices (x-rays machines, radiation machines, pacemakers) - even when requirements were met and software was given the green light to ship.
Posted by David Worthington
13th Feb
-4 Votes
+ -
Why ??
What use can they have for them ??

Security, you can't scan a SUV with a bomb in it, for example.

America is so gun crazy, are you seriously going to try ban them from Federal offices.
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
13th Feb
+5 Votes
+ -
Ohhhh, Puuuuulease!
If the thought of guns scare you so badly, go get therapy!
Posted by mdwalls
13th Feb
+6 Votes
+ -
SUVs don't go through front doors of office buildings, and
what the heck is that about "gun crazy" America?

The vast majority of Americans are not crazy about guns, and the vast majority of those that do possess them, are also very responsible in how they use them. Gun crazy might be one of the favorite terms used by those that want to ban guns, but, the majority of Americans want the "right to bear arms", to remain in place. The people exhibiting anti-social behavior with guns, are the criminals and those with mental issues. Why should the entire country have their rights limited because of the elements in society that do create most of the problems?
Posted by adornoe
13th Feb
-4 Votes
+ -
Why limit the whole country regarding right to bear arms?
Simple. The government, the police, the school principal, don't know if you are a criminal, want to be criminal, or are criminally psychotically insane. If you think that you can be trusted with a fire arm under all circumstances you are probably wrong. People often get bursts of anger for legitimate reasons but without a weapon to act out you are limited to striking out with a fist or a foot, neither of which are usually lethal. Then the rage is over and you resume life. Many who have a gun do what is considered a stupid act, they use it not to defend but to have revenge. Even going from having a pistol in a drawer to having a rifle locked away in a gun cabinet reduces gun violence to less than a quarter. Come on NRA, give your head a shake. Look at countries around the world which have put in gun control and banned hand guns or limited their use to those who legitimately need them. Look at the stats. You don't have a leg to stand on do you? Well, do you?
Posted by radiodog4@...
13th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
Why limit the whole country regarding right to bear arms?
You would be surprised how wrong it is your statement about countries with gun control and its effectiveness in curbing violence. For one, here in Brazil, the only people that are denied gun ownership are honest people, which look for lawful ways of acquiring firearms. All the rest, including criminals of the worst kind and drug dealers have no problem in arming themselves to the teeth. Smuggling firearms thru the long and unmonitored borders from countries neighboring Brazil is rampant! And with a wimp judicial system, focused more on the human rights of felons then of those of honest citizens, no wonder people is assaulted in the streets, inside their jobs, coming out of banks, in teller machines, working as cashiers at stores, at home, for a handful of money, and killed for no reason, like if nothing will ever bother the thug. Most of the time these criminals leave their guns hanging on the waist belt during their jobs with the certainty that no one around is armed to shoot them back, until the last moment before they leave the scene when they play destiny. They even kill and steel guns from the police in infantile ambushes in the middle of the streets at any time of the day with the assurance that they will never encounter any confrontation. (U.N. (UNODC) Statistics for Brazil 2009: 180 million people, 43909 assassinated. - Statistic for USA 2009: 315 million people, 15241 assassinated). Either this or that way, as a Brazilian, I would like to have my chances, but I don
Posted by jmvneto51
20th Feb
+7 Votes
+ -
RE: Why?
Ah, the UK spokesperson again. They already are banned. Unless you're a sworn officer you can't even take a pocket knife into a federal facility. Right now, the UK murder rate per capita is approximately 2x what the US is and you guys are now legislating against kitchen knives. Fascinating.
Posted by GregGold
13th Feb
+4 Votes
+ -
Body scanners
One can't help wondering what the build up of radiation dosage would be if employees have to clock in five days a week. These machines have no use for now on. They're just another an enormous waste of money, and they need to be scrapped. Another government blunder!
Posted by kitemanmusic
13th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
they will glow
Just think after a couple of years worth of radiation, you will know who workd for the government... just turn off the lights and look for the ones who glow in the dark! Ha Ha Ha Ha!
Posted by geofer50
13th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Install them on all government employee entrances
Then after all the useless parasites die of cancer we can get a real government that is actually competent at something other than wasting money on stupid cancer causing scanners.
Posted by Reality Bites
13th Feb
+5 Votes
+ -
Install them at TSA headquarters
Seems only right.
Posted by dmm99
13th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
On the border
along with the dogs-might speed things up. Maybe find the cocaine weiners.
Posted by Hans Schmidt
13th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Use them in prisons
to scan convicts in and out of medical facilities, work areas and visitation areas. Don't really care much about their health.
Posted by don3605
13th Feb
-2 Votes
+ -
You are so stupid
You could be in prison yourself, stupid, all it takes is someone wnting and willing to destroy your life. All they have to do is sign a piece of paper saying you did something illegal and be convincing in ourt.. also you could be ompletely innocent and go to prison just because someone is a good liar ..Never think you are immune..You're not!
Posted by acyron
14th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!