Follow this blog:
RSS

An electric bus that wirelessly charges at each stop

By | November 19, 2012, 9:55 AM PST

One of the challenges with electric buses used for public transit is keeping them on the road all day without putting them in the garage for long charging sessions.

But new technology could make electric buses more common in transit fleets. That’s because researchers at Utah State University have unveiled first-of-its-kind technology that wirelessly powers buses.

The Aggie Bus (above) is, according the university, the first developed by a North America organization that is powered wirelessly and the world’s first electric bus with wireless power transfer technology that has a power level up to 25 kilowatts, an efficiency of more than 90 percent between the power grid and battery, and at least a six inch air gap between the charger and bus. The best part? The bus battery can charge at bus stops as it picks up passengers.

Next year a Utah State University spin-out company, Wave, Inc. (which helped develop the Aggie Bus), will partner with the Utah Transit Authority to provide the first commercial demonstration of the bus, in 2013. And passengers of the bus won’t notice a difference.

“Current battery limitations prevent an all-electric transit bus from operating all day from an overnight charge,” said Wesley Smith, CEO of Wave in a statement. “WAVE solves that problem by charging the bus wirelessly during its daily operations when the bus stops to load and off-load passengers. This technology makes electric buses competitive with their diesel hybrid and CNG counterparts.”

But it’s not just buses that will benefit from this technology, according to Robert Behunin, Utah State University’s vice president of commercialization and regional development:

“As a result of the work done by Utah State engineers, scientists and partners, EV owners and operators will now be able to simply drive over a pad in the ground to recharge their batteries, the benefits of which reach far beyond convenience.”

Photo: PR Newswire

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Microwave Ovens - everywhere
90% efficiency is attractive, but what about the 10% that is lost to the environment? Wirelessly transmitting that much energy in an area so close to people seems like there could be cellular effects similar to what might be expected from a poorly designed diathermy machine (basically a microwave oven used by physical therapists and some chiropractors to heat (or cook if not applied smartly) tissue beneath the skin). Even if the frequency spectrum is different, that only changes, and does not eliminate the problem as in physical therapy every heating therapy is basically just another form of radiation transmitted at a different frequency. My take is that this technology should be evalulated for its potential to harm people, pets and interfere with electronic equipment.
Posted by Ken_SF
19th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
I'm guessing...
That the coupling method used is electromagnetic, rather than by microwave or similar radiation.

That is - basically a transformer.
Posted by fairportfan
19th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Microwaves
I was going to rip into this for its technical inaccuracies, but on second thought you have a point.

Nikola Tesla was working with low-frequency parametric and resonant circuits based around air- and ferrite-cored coils. Neither of those can achieve GHz (microwave) frequencies. You need shaped antennae to do this for starters.
Tesla's technology has since been redeveloped somewhat, now that his stolen ideas have been released to the public after they were sat on by the US Government for all those years.

We now have wireless power systems that can drive flat-panel TVs with a few feet separating emitter and receiver based on the same technology as Tesla was working on when his lab was burned down. The work has been established as very similar to current radio control systems, but transmitted power as well as signal from a truly huge coil. It was intended to drive remote control submarines from the coastline, and this was probably the reason it was destroyed.
This much is history...

However, saying that, there is something that is affecting us and our environment. I gave up smoking, because I dont fancy dying a slow and painful death if I can help it. However, if you look at the evidence, it might not make the slightest bit of difference.

Basically cancer rates have risen fro 1 in 10 to 1 in 3 over the last 10-15 years that I've been aware of it. There are less smokers now than there were a decade ago despite population increase. Smoking materials have improved in quality, as has lifestyle and general health, and yet cancer still continues to rise.
That doesnt add up. Neither does the recent report -from the government no less- that states that women who stop smoking under 30 will be pretty much unaffected by that in later life. That goes against the dire warnings on the tobacco as well - so the government know too that its not smoking causing it.

My initial guess would be all the microwave energy surrounding us, but there is also little evidence to suggest that too. Studies on phones have shown that there isnt a clear link between phone use and cancer, and animals would also be dying in their millions from cancerous growths - some of them get a *lot* closer to MW emitters than we do, perching on towers, dishes and the like seemingly without harm.

I'm not sure 'global warming' or our health have anything to do with radiative technologies. Personally I'd be more worried about the synthetic rubbish we feed ourselves on.

Peace
Posted by SiO2
Updated - 19th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Defeats the pupose
The very concept of battery powered vehicles is just pure marketing and nothing else unless may be we are talking about hydrogen fuel cells and like. The end user is given the impression that he/she is 'doing his/her bit for the environment'. It almost seems fashionable to be environmentally friendly by using electric vehicles. But the power plants have to work more and spew more pollution to charge these batteries. Add to that this 10% extra wastage, and the purpose of an electric vehicle itself gets a kick in the proverbial a$$.

However, it may be that such an endeavour can check pollution by keeping the diesel vehicles off the road by enhancing the running times of electric vehicles. But, the alternative to that can be pumping in more of the electric vehicles. However, for a true analysis, a study of pollution equivalency between a gasoline powered engine and a power plant will be required.
Posted by rk12345
Updated - 23rd Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Electric Bus
A city bus is typically stopping for a few minutes. How much of electric power can be
transmitted to the bus in this short time ? Aren't there some current limitations ?
BTW - for all those opposing electric vehicles : Even if electricity comes from fossile-fuel
plants - the amount of pollution a utility emits in order to charge a car is ONLY ONE SIXTH
of the pollution the gasoline-powered car being replaced emits...So, replacing ANY gasoline-powered car WILL REDUCE POLLUTION, regardless what's charging the
electric replacement !
Posted by osibaruch
23rd Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!