Follow this blog:
RSS

A T-shirt that saves children from drowning

By | October 17, 2012, 9:45 AM PDT

A comfortable T-shirt designed by students has the potential to save children who accidentally fall into swimming pools.

NBC News reports that the device, called the Watawescue, is intended for children between 2 and 4 years old. Fitted with a mechanism that automatically inflates the clothing when soaking wet, it could act as a safety net for children playing near pools.

The T-shirt has been designed as part of the 2012-2013 InvenTeams Program by team ‘GLAZZ’. The program is a Lemelson-MIT designed to get high-school students excited about the possibility of a STEM (science, technology, mathematics, engineering) career.

The team came up with the design after reviewing 46 deaths attributable to drowning in Arizona during the first six months of this year — 15 of which were children.

“If the child falls in the water in an accident, the mechanism will go off and the inflatable bladder will inflate below the arms,” Briana Soto, a senior at the Girls Leadership Academy of Arizona and part of GLAZZ said.

The inflation mechanism is sewn into a mesh fabric that wraps under the arms, and will inflate only if a child becomes soaked — so sprinklers or spilling juice won’t be enough to accidentally inflate your child every other moment.

A carbon-dioxide cartridge and alarm mechanism is stored into a tiny pouch at the back of the T-shirt; sealed with a bobbin that dissolves once immersed in water. As it dissolves, compressed gas produces a loud sound as the tube inflates, warning parents of danger.

The all-girl team will showcase their projects at MIT in June 2013. In the meantime, GLAZZ will receive $10,000 and industry advice to further refine their design.

It is not intended to replace a life jacket, but as parents who have suffered the accidental death of a child by drowning have said — it only takes five minutes.

According to statistics, drowning is the second leading cause of accidental injury-related death among children ages 1 to 14, and among children ages 1 to 4 years, most drownings occurs in residential or home swimming pools. In addition, roughly 5,000 children 14 and under go to the hospital because of accidental drowning-related incidents each year; 15 percent of these cases results in death, and 20 percent suffer from permanent neurological disabilities.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Yeah - something we need ... a lot.
When i was about eight years old (that would be in 1956 or so) my mother, kid brother (four years younger) and i went to visit a college friend of hers who was in town.

We were in the pool at her hotel. Well, i was in the pool, and Dave was walking along the edge pulling a toy boat on a string.

And he fell in. And sank straight to the bottom.

Luckily, i was close enough to grab his arm and pull him up enough for our mom to rescue him. If i'd been further away, it might have turned out rather worse.

Oh - by the way - some of you who read SF may have heard of the four-year-old who almost drowned that day - his name is David Weber.
Posted by fairportfan
17th Oct
+3 Votes
+ -
Hmmmm
This would make laundry day really interesting...
Posted by Diver John
17th Oct
+1 Vote
+ -
it may prevent the kids from drowning but
the comment make me almost die laughing.... (i am grateful for it)
Posted by dkaparunakis@...
19th Oct
-1 Votes
+ -
'Its not intendend to replace a lifejacket'
No, it IS a lifejacket.

So a bunch of students were mis-educated into thinking that repurposing other peoples ideas into funding is a great idea. I dont see how this is even newsworthy, unless the article was meant to be sarcastic - and I dont think it was.

Sure, kids are at risk from all kinds of danger and water is no exception, but surely a responsible person would make sure that children dont have access to water or are supervised. That alone negates the need for a lifejacket...
If a child manages to wander off and find some water to fall into, it would be very unlikely to be wearing one of these unless the parent was paranoid about the danger.
And if the parent had the forethought to put a child in one out of need, then they should be watching the child and not doing other things because the child is 'safe'.

Good idea in principle, yes, as a lifejacket is.
As a parent and carer of a disabled adult that I have raised alone from a baby, I know of all the tiny risks and thoughtless things that can end a vulnerable life. A moments inattention and theres toxins and obstructions down the throat, the wheels of a car, a loose cable with a steam iron on the end of it and a million other things we routinely pay attention to, and have to.

There is no substitute for attention. A trendy tee with a lifesaver in it is cotton-wool; just an excuse to ignore the real danger of the presence of unguarded water. What a total waste of time, effort and money. I hope no-one comes to harm because of it.
Posted by SiO2
18th Oct
+2 Votes
+ -
It's all about risk
Responsibility is about understanding our limitations and taking steps to reduce the risk of something happening because of those limitations. We shouldn't assume we can stop bad things from happening just because we don't want them to, or because we think we can cover all bases without exception.

Whilst I agree there is no substitute for attention, generalising that everyone should be paying 100% attention to their child 100% of the time is, at best unrealistic, and at worst dangerous - I know this as the parent of a 4 year old.

This product is one of many that parents can use to manage risk, like the fire guard, the stair gate, the covers for electrical sockets.

Now I don't live near water, but if I did I wouldn't assume that I could ever stop my child from falling in, and I might well buy one of these to prevent the worst happening should that risk become exposed. It's not me being paranoid, it's me acknowledging I might not be able to prevent an accident and covering that.
Yes, all these products can be over-relied on, with parents buying them and then absolving themselves of all responsibility afterwards. However, I wouldn't simply put it on my child, sit back and let them wander around assuming the t-shirt means they are totally safe - that is irresponsible.

It's not the product that's a problem - it's an irresponsible attitude. Don't confuse the two.
Posted by Raad@...
18th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with that in principle
I've needed stair gates, socket covers and the like, still do need some of them...

These are all safety devices that have been born out of necessity and are something that a parent uses to prevent a clear and present danger.

This thing is a nightmare because of the attitude it promotes; one of false security - and its very hard to apply properly too.
I cant think of a single place where one of these would be useful, where a proper lifesaver is also appropriate, and probably more so.

The only place where that is not true, is where a child is poorly supervised near water and there is a risk of danger, not an actual danger that requires that 100% attention you spoke of. It fosters the irresponsible attitude that the child is safe, and that less attention is required.

I do understand however, that raising an individual that continues to be more vulnerable that her peers has made me a little more cautious than the average parent. In the early days my every waking moment was filled with the possibility that my daughter might not make tomorrow, and I took every step I could to try and ensure she did.

It showed me one thing at least; humans from western culture at least have forgotten how to raise their young. We protect them from all real experience and provide them with bright and colourful things to occupy their time safely, and dont spend the attention we used to. Its called nurturing, and as a male single parent it was something I had to learn - where all around me I see inadequate parenting.

I'm not perfect either, but it just makes me sad and a little angry to witness.
Posted by SiO2
18th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
how about a water 'beeper'?
After a sewer back up, I put these water 'alarm' devices by the drains in my basement. Boy, do they work. Just a drop of water and they let off an eardrum piercing alarm. Maybe someone could modify this & put it in a fun kids' necklace or bracelet (that they'd actually wear). Maybe hook it up to the parent's cell phone (which, hopefully, they aren't engrossed in while their kid's in trouble)?

Agree that a watchful eye is the best idea. But I get that it's never possible to be in two places at once.
Posted by changeofart
18th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
Swimming lessons
It is possible to give even infants a form of swimming lessons. If a child is familiar with being in the water they won't panic if they accidentally find themselves in it and the chances of survival increase immensely.
Posted by riverat1
18th Oct
-1 Votes
+ -
Swim
Would teaching them to swim and be self sufficient in water not be a better idea. It's a fundamental life skill after all.
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
6th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Laundry
I agree when you can get it out your wash machine I going to blame them for it
Posted by Nadiya M.
10th Dec
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!