Follow this blog:
RSS

A boot camp for hacking electric vehicles

By | October 4, 2012, 3:05 AM PDT

An electric vehicle’s reliance on computing makes it vulnerable to cyberattacks - could a boot camp solve the industry’s problems?

Electric vehicles, while useful and becoming increasingly necessary if dwindling fossil fuels are to be conserved, do come with their issues. Infant battery technology has put off some car manufacturers — including Toyota who recently scrapped plans for a second car — from embracing the potential of EVs.

From altering the dashboard to breaking in, an EV electronics system is likely to be a prime target for hackers. Wired reports that recently, a team of cyber security experts tested an EV’s defenses — finding that it was easy to break in, eavesdrop on conversations, turn off the engine or cause havoc to the braking system.

If EVs are ever going to become mainstream, not only does the technology itself need to mature, but these exploits have to be remedied. Battelle, a large nonprofit R&D organization, is battling this problem — beginning with the novel approach of hosting a summer camp for students to discover and fix car-security issues.

In a new August boot camp called the “CyberAuto Challenge”, 20 high school and college students worked with engineers, IT researchers and Department of Defense officials in a collective hackathon. Teams were given daily instruction in design, coding and ethics, as well as completing hands-on challenges to improve EV security.

The hands-on training is designed to ensure engineers have the skills necessary to protect our cars in the future. Karl Heimer, senior research director of Battelle’s Cyber Innovation Unit commented:

“We’ve seen a sequence of events that suggests that there is going to be explosive growth and development in connected car technology. One of the critical aspects is connecting people and organizations. So we reached out to the auto industry and government and told them why it’s important to develop the sort of engineers we’re going to need in two, three, five, or 10 years time.”

(via Wired)

Image credit: Coda

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Planes
So why don't we have these problems with planes like the 777, A300, and MD11? How is their technology that much different - fly by wire and autopilot? They have very similar systems to computers.
Posted by RJHerrmann
4th Oct
0 Votes
+ -
What's the difference?
I feel I'm missing a point somewhere. I don't see the substitution of a battery for a conventional engine as increasing the vulnerability of a vehicle to cyberattack. There's a reference to 'connected car technology', but surely that applies equally to conventionally powered vehicles doesn't it?
Posted by Brian Luff
4th Oct
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!