Follow this blog:
RSS

3D houses “grown” like bones

By | November 5, 2012, 2:47 AM PST

Softkill has developed a 3D printing technique for large scale construction which mimics the growth process of bones.

A London-based team of architects and designers at studio Softkill have been researching new methods of generative design for additive manufacturing. In other words, this is the shape 3D printing could eventually take in the future — literally.

A new concept design called Protohome was presented at last week’s 3D Printshow. Taking the more “traditional” method of 3D construction and turning it on its head, the team tested how large-scale 3D printing could be made lighter, more flexible and created without the need for adhesives.

The result? A computer algorithm which transforms printed material into fibrous pieces that can be “grown” and twisted in the same way that human bone builds – reinforcing stress-prone areas to keep breaks to a minimum. This creates a “web” of material rather than solid mass, but does mean the material is permeable. Therefore, waterproof coating is placed inside.

Displaying a 3D printed house at 1.33 scale, each fiber that winds through one continuous cantilevered structure has a 0.7mm radius. A house built at scale would require 31 separate pieces to construct. The team says that the:

“Softkill house moves away from heavy, compression-based 3D printing of on-site buildings, instead proposing lightweight, high resolution, optimised structures which, at life scale, are manageable truck-sized pieces that can be printed off site and later assembled on site.”

Aaron Silver of Softkill Design told Dezeen that 3D printing could result in cheaper builds which require less material to construct. “I think there really is an interesting future for architecture and 3D printing,” he said, “You have great cost savings, material efficiency, things like that, which architects are vastly interested in.”

This research was founded at the Architectural Association School of Architecture’s Design Research Lab, and research prototypes were supported by Materialise.

Image credit: Softkill

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Charlie Osborne

About Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Contributing Editor

Charlie Osborne is a freelance journalist and graphic designer based in London. In addition to SmartPlanet, she also writes the iGeneration column for business technology website ZDNet. She holds degrees in medical anthropology from the University of Kent.

Follow her on Twitter.

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne

Charlie Osborne does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Change the name
Would YOU put your children in a "Softkill" house?
Posted by dmm99
5th Nov
-1 Votes
+ -
Proof of Concept
It's a bit proof of concept, but overall seems a little pointless.

I'm sure you could eventually 3D print a new-born baby, but the traditional method is probably still better.
Posted by neil.postlethwaite@...
5th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Softkill House
As someone pointed out - pointless. So many people have sensitivities to artificial materials (plastics). Do we really need more? Also does the material degrade in sunlight? Will it, at some point, collapse around your ears? Knowing what I do about the breakdown products of many plastics would I like to spend over half my day inside one of these structures? As an experiment it's really interesting, as a practical thing at this point in time, not interested.
Posted by radiodog4@...
5th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
Allergies
you could happily use flexible ceramics or similar materials. Actually, nanocrystalline cellulose would be ideal, coated. And it does note that there would be a waterproof coat; this can very easily also be hypoallergenic.
Posted by kax@...
8th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
building structures in zero g?
It would be fun to contemplate how you could use in-situ 3d printing to build habitats in space, e.g. to expand the ISS. The load bearing requirements in zero g would be radically relaxed, but it could be useful to organically expand living quarters on demand.
Posted by rdpoor
5th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Incompent assumptions
Housing consists of a number of major process components (frame, coverings, insulation, wiring and its insulation, breakers and switching systems, plumbing, high wear and water proof materials for kitchens and baths and heating and cooling systems. Thinking 3-D printing will be economically competitive to current processes in traditional housing markets - given the dramatically higher cost of 3-D print materials, print material limitations, as compared to traditional materials - not to mention that most print materials are peak petroleum derived and or dependent - is more than absurd. Not considering that the housing structure is not necessarily even the most expensive part of house construction - is another give away to the incompetent assumptions.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
5th Nov
+1 Vote
+ -
I'm afraid it is not the first prototype
Not only it is not the first prototype but neither it is the first 3D printed house, I'm afraid. Have a look at Enrico Dini's work in D-Shape, monolite-UK, or just google images of Enrico Dini.

Just here: http://www.dinitech.it/gallery_DINITECH/gallery.html
Posted by CGpando
5th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
I like the idea
It is a very good idea, not for housing, but for mechanical structures. It seems to be a very effective algorithm for designing space frames. You should be able to get extremely light and strong structures with this approach. I think the idea would be wasted in the building industry where weight is probably the least of concerns- now in the Aerospace on the other hand.........
Posted by Riaanh
6th Nov
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!