Follow this blog:
RSS

Books | Parental lament

By | February 15, 2013, 3:00 AM PST

This week, the press pays tribute to the 50th anniversary of The Feminine Mystique. In 1963, author Betty Friedan extolled, “We can no longer ignore that voice within women that says: ‘I want something more than my husband and my children and my home.’ ”

In his first book, What to Expect When No One’s Expecting: America’s Coming Demographic Disaster (Encounter Books, $23.99), Jonathan V. Last offers a contrary, contemporary perspective: our population is aging, and since children are our future, we must recruit more mothers.

Age-wise, the U.S. will mirror one giant Florida by 2050, according to Last and his statistics. This will have major repercussions for the country, beginning with its very flawed Social Security system. There are other implications: future America may include a smaller military, because there are few people to join up.

Last argues, “An older society with fewer children will find it difficult to project power in the wider world,” and “If America wants to continue to lead the world, we need to have more babies.”

His thesis brings to mind the question posed by a New York Times op-ed written by David J. Rothkopf in October 2011. “Isn’t the important question not how we remain No.1 but rather, what we want to be best at – and even, whether we want to lead at all?”

Here are the facts. In 2012, America had its lowest birthrate since 1920. But the nation doesn’t lead the world in fertility decline: other countries are faring much worse, especially Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia and Singapore. The United States also has two significant advantages: a large influx of immigrants, and a plenty of individuals who want to be moms and dads.

Last, who is a senior writer at the conservative magazine The Weekly Standard, is upfront about his social views. “Yes, I’m one of those anti-abortion nut jobs who thinks that every embryo is sacred life and abortion is killing an innocent and blah-blah-blah.”

And Last believes overpopulation is a myth. He’s anti-college, and decries the separation of church and state. As for the dangers of global warming? “Even if you take climate change to be real, and serious, and man-made, you still have to reckon that the environmental impact of ‘overpopulation’ is, at worst, a mixed bag.”

Reading What to Expect When No One’s Expecting would vex many. I’d guess that every single American woman could take offense to some part of Last’s text, which is, at points, condescending, sarcastic and insincere. Six people blurbed the book, none female.

In Last’s book, career-driven women who decide not to have children come across as 1) sub-human and 2) lazy, unwilling to sacrifice self-centeredness for the common good.

Yet he does describe the the entry of women into the workforce as “enormously beneficial,” and stresses his aversion to the “barefoot and pregnant” trope.

Women who are unable to have children due to medical conditions are not addressed; neither is adoption. But on the subject of later-life in vitro fertilization or gestational carriers, Last writes, “If we reach the point where people are so busy with their own lives that they outsource baby-making to a lab, then it’s not clear why they’d be willing to yoke themselves into parenthood at all.”

Naturally, he is against couples living together. If two people plan on getting married, they should just do so before the move-in, so they can start having children and lower their risk of future divorce. Nevermind the counter-argument that cohabitating can prevent ultimately incompatible people from marrying and reproducing.

Last’s weakest digression is devoted to the car seat, which is “objectively pro-child, it is also vaguely anti-family.” In his mind, they’re bulky, so you can fit fewer kids in a car. “As a side note, [car seats] didn’t radically transform auto safety, either. The most optimistic estimate is that between 1975 and 2005, car seats saved a grand total of 7,896 lives. Every one of them is a miracle for which we should be thankful. But saving 263 lives a year isn’t exactly conquering polio,” writes Last, a father of three who drives a minivan.

After all the advocating for parenthood, Last ends without the expected sentimentality: “Having kids is, literally, no fun…But pleasure is a shallow goal and the well-examined life requires more. It demands seriousness of purpose. Nothing is more serious than having children.”

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Jenna Marotta

About Jenna Marotta

Jenna Marotta is books editor for SmartPlanet.

Jenna Marotta

Jenna Marotta

Books Editor

Jenna Marotta has written for New York magazine's Daily Intel, Grub Street and Vulture blogs as well as The Daily Beast, The Onion's A.V. Club, Jezebel.com, Time Out New York, Time Out Chicago and Chicago magazine. She has spoken at DePaul University and taught a song parody writing workshop at 826CHI. A former Saturday Night Live intern, she studied improvisation and sketch-comedy writing at the Upright Citizens Brigade Theatre in New York and iO Chicago. She splits her time between the two cities.

Follow her on Twitter.

Jenna Marotta

Jenna Marotta

Jenna Marotta does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
13
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-2 Votes
+ -
What in the world?!
Having kids is, literally, no fun
Posted by AlanLaRue
15th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
I disagree
Our son was born when I was in my late 30s. Now we don't know how we lived without him. Sure, it's been work, but we have had more fun with him than we ever had before.
Posted by mudpuppy1
16th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
Demographics is destiny
I have not read Mr. Last's book, but I have read a review of it in another publication; the difference in attitude is amazing. The reaction here is akin to a mom pulling a rotting rat out of her closet (where it had died in a forgotten trap, perhaps) and holding her nose at the stench. "Yech!" she is thinking. "Maybe I have a rodent issue..."

Believe it or not, folks, the citizens/workers/consumers of tomorrow will not be robots or clones made in a lab. They will be our grandkids (hope we have 30) and would be your's, if some of you hadn't dealt oh so discretely with your POCs. Having and raising kids is not for everyone; I don't recommend it for the faint of heart. May all of you who don't want them work hard, pay your taxes and spend your retirement traveling in Italy (where they will desperately need your tourist dollars to keep their economy from completely collapsing). Meanwhile, we will fulfill the creation mandate.

(All our grandkids will be taught from a very early age that voting for a limited, constitutional and republican form of government will be in their best interests. How 'bout yours?)
Posted by ClearCreek
15th Feb
-2 Votes
+ -
Rats in the closet
I was thinking less "yech!" and more "yikes!"

That the world birthrate is declinining, and we're fortunate to have some advantages on the rest of the developed world. It was the author's tone (climate change, car seats) and unprovoked jabs that I found baffling. For instance, apparently the University of Virginia at Richmond is "thoroughly mediocre," (Last 165).
Posted by Jenna Marotta
15th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
Where we are headed.
Smart people are over thinking the decision to have kids. They are missing the basic reason for kids. Survival of the species.

Idocracy is our future.

We are already seeing it with the population explosion in parts of the world with poor education.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 15th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
Actually, we're seeing it here.
Experienced first as comedy, then as farce, ultimately as tragedy.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
15th Feb
-3 Votes
+ -
demographic idiocy
Nice post Jenna. The notion that we can continue to add mouths in a resource constrained world still baffles me. It's a notion that has legs if you buy into the perpetual growth myth. We feed our billions because of mechanized food production provided by fossil fuels. When industrialized food production starts to wind down, so will the population. It would be far more humane to avoid adding to the numbers than to bury the starving victims. Of course there will be demographic penalties to pay. Many countries understand this which is why birthrates are falling in the developed countries. Smart people and educated people already get it. Our task should be to get the message out to the third world women who probably already get it but are constrained by their societal norms.
Posted by hugho
15th Feb
-1 Votes
+ -
Thank you
Very well said, Hugho.
Posted by Jenna Marotta
15th Feb
+2 Votes
+ -
America is hardly the worst off in this regard...
...as the article mentions. Western Europe is literally depopulating. In fact, other western nations (I know West Germany used to) have in the past have actively subsidized childbearing.

The real victim of this will not be the human race (at least in the short run), but it will likely be the values of western civilization.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
15th Feb
+1 Vote
+ -
Weren't some of them
like Russia considering (or actually doing it) paying women to have babies?
Posted by mudpuppy1
Updated - 16th Feb
-3 Votes
+ -
What to expect...
By this Author's admission he is an anti-abortion "nut" and decries separation of church and state his motives are laughably questionable. Here's what he really means..WE are running out of WHITE people and need more to retain power. tired stupidity from the religious ignorant is passe' and I'm not going to allow them to spread their denial of science, misunderstanding of literally everything, and sheer prejudice any longer. Over population is not real for this "author" and He just wants more christians to keep those damn other religions away. All the arguments about demographics and aging etc. are quite real but I don't need an imbecile with a stunted world view to give me his opinion thinly veiled as deep thought. He can't face reality so I dismiss him completely.
Posted by gouldbj
15th Feb
+3 Votes
+ -
Why did you have to go racist?
My experience has shown that most people who rip out the race card at every chance are the biggest bigots around.

Which is why their comments go right to race.

They are projecting their personality and feelings on the world around them.

They wave the flag of tolerance while preaching division and fear.

I dismiss you completely.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 15th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
A different view
There is no catastrophe in a couple having no children, or only one. It is a personal choice at present. A couple can have children either for altruistic motives or for motives of the deepest selfishness. Some parents, few we hope, have children in order for the parents to exert personal power to mold their children to a preconceived pattern. Nor should we be dismayed if a nation loses population. There is no predestined minimum number that any nation must have. America, for example, was a great nation with less than half its present population. We should want, and hope, that every child born is a wanted child, that the child will have two caring adults to help enrich his or her upbringing, and that sufficient material support will be available to provide a quality life for the child.

Our planetary resources in many areas are finite, getting more costly to extract, and will someday become depleted in practical terms even if some remains undiscovered in the depths of the planet. It can be only conjecture as to how many people the planet, and technology, can ensure a prosperous life for in coming centuries. It is not conjecture, but sure knowledge, to know that billions already live in poverty and have done so for many years. The minor economic gains that have emerged in the poorest nations have come too slowly to feel confident that the suffering poor will become prosperous in the foreseeable future.

So, congratulations to those who choose parenthood, and thank you to those who do not. Both viewpoints are necessary: to avoid a disastrous population explosion, and to sustain a human presence on this this small planet that has no mind to care what we do.
Posted by marvinlee
16th Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!